Introduction

In micro-vascular surgery, there is no consensus regarding which vessel to be repaired first - the artery or the vein. For practical reasons, the deeper or more difficult to reach vessel is repaired first [1]. Repair of the artery first has the advantage of early flap revascularization and reducing the warm ischemia time. Arterial repair first may reveal the dominant venous drainage and aid in the selection of donor vein, if only one vein is to be repaired (depending upon the availability of recipient vein/s). The disadvantage of repairing the artery first is that, if the artery is unclamped after the anastomosis, bleeding from the second vena comitans makes the repair of vein difficult. If the second vein is also clamped, then venous congestion develops, which is well known to be detrimental to flap survival [2]. Alternatively, if the venous anastomosis is performed first, it delays revascularization of the flap.

We routinely perform the arterial anastomosis first and unclamp the artery during venous anastomosis. The aim of our innovative idea is to divert the bleeding from the freely draining vena comitans away from the venous anastomosis site. Therefore, we tried an innovative technique using the finger of a surgical glove to divert venous blood from the second vena comitans away from the surgical field.

Methods

In oncological head & neck reconstruction, we routinely use the free radial artery forearm flap, medial sural artery perforator flap, anterolateral thigh flap, and fibula osteocutaneous flap. In all these flaps, our innovative technique is used as and when needed. We always perform the arterial anastomosis first and unclamp the artery during venous anastomosis; however, we do not clamp the second vena comitans. We introduce the second vena comitans into one end of a cut glove finger rinsed with heparinised saline [5000 I.U. of heparin in 500 ml saline] to divert the bleeding from the operative field. This technique is demonstrated in the following video: https://youtu.be/Bh0iPG9WtpM

Discussion

In an experimental study in an animal model, Thomson et al. [2] showed that flap failure was highest if the arterial anastomosis was performed first and immediately unclamped. This result was due to venous congestion as the vein was clamped during anastomosis [2]. In the study conducted by Thomson et al. [2], the average anastomosis time for artery and vein was 25 ± 4 minutes and 26 ± 3 minutes, respectively. The time taken for anastomosis is comparable to the actual average time taken during the surgery by us. However, the other experimental animal study by Zhang et al. [3] concluded that a brief venous stasis during anastomosis after the establishment of arterial inflow was not detrimental to flap survival and the sequence of anastomosis would not affect the outcome in both skin and muscle flap [3]. In this study by Zhang et al, the average anastomosis time for artery and vein was 8 to 10 minutes and 12 to 16 minutes, respectively. These timings are too fast compared to the average time taken during surgery in operation theatre. The difference in outcome/failure rate in the above two studies may be due to the total time taken for artery and vein. 

If the time of anastomosis increases, injury to vessels due to clamp application becomes significantly higher [2]. Often, untoward circumstances arising during surgery may prolong the total anastomosis time even further.

At the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital where more than 800 flaps are performed per year, the usual practice is to repair the artery first and leave it unclamped while the vein is being repaired. Clamping of the vein has not caused any major problem in their practice [1]. We also routinely perform the arterial anastomosis first and unclamp the artery during venous anastomosis. If the second vena comitans is present, we reduce venous congestion by allowing the second vein to drain freely. Blood from the freely draining vena comitans will accumulate at the anastomosis site (Figure 1A). To avoid this unwanted accumulation of blood at the venous anastomosis site, we tried an innovative technique by introducing the second vena comitans into one end of a cut glove finger [rinsed with heparinized normal saline] to drain the blood away from the anastomosis site (Figure 1B, 1C).

Sometimes (in anterolateral thigh and medial sural artery perforator flaps), the vena comitans join together to form a single larger vein which is easy to repair, and we dissect untill anastomosable length of larger vein is achieved. In such circumstances, we usually dissect and keep a proximal branch of the vascular bundle for about a centimeter before the application of ligaclip. After arterial repair, we remove the ligaclip from the vein to allow this proximal tributary of the vein to drain freely in cut finger glove to reduce venous congestion (Figure 2).

We had measured blood loss from the unclamped vena comitans by weighing mops before and after use. The average blood loss was 33 ml, 21 ml, 14 ml, and 8 ml in fibula osteocutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh flap, radial artery forearm flap, and medial sural artery perforator flap, respectively.
 

Conclusion

This simple innovative technique helps in achieving a clear surgical field at the time of venous repair by diverting the venous bleeding through a glove finger and at the same time preventing venous congestion of the flap.

References 

1. Wei FC, Tay SKL. Chapter 26: Principles and techniques of microvascular surgery. In: Neligan PC ,Gurtner, GC (Eds.). Plastic Surgery Principles in Plastic Surgery, vol. 1, 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2013.
2. Thomson JG, Kim JH, Syed SA, Reid MA, Madsen J, Restifo RJ. The effect of prolonged clamping and vascular stasis on the patency of arterial and venous microanastomoses. Ann Plast Surg 1998;40(4):436-441. [View Article]
3. Zhang F, Pang Y, Buntic R, et al. Effect of sequence, timing of vascular anastomosis, and clamp removal on survival of microsurgical flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2002;18(8):697-702. [View Article]