Search Submit
Close

Indocyanine Green Angiography in Salvage Planning: From Pedicled Supraclavicular Flap to Free Supraclavicular Flap

International Microsurgery Journal. 2021;5(1):4
DOI: 10.24983/scitemed.imj.2021.00145
Article Type: Case Report

Abstract

The supraclavicular flap has gained popularity in recent years as a reliable and easily harvested flap with occasional anatomical variations in the course of the pedicle. In this case study, the excision of a cancer lesion on the face of 70-year-old female patient had resulted in a soft tissue defect of size 8 x 9 cm. The reconstruction of the surgical defect was done by using the supraclavicular perforator flap. The flap perforators were marked preoperatively with a handheld Doppler using indocyanine green angiography. During the flap dissection, the dominant perforator was determined by a selective clamping of each of the perforators guided by the indocyanine green angiography. Though the distal perforator was determined to be the dominant one, the pedicled flap design was found to be of inadequate length to reach the surgical defect. Consequently, the flap was turned into a free flap. The pedicle was anastomosed to the branches of facial vessels and survived completely. In conclusion, we believe that the dominant perforator may be identified by intraoperative indocyanine green angiography which would help in making a proper decision for flap design.

Keywords

  • Free supraclavicular flap; ICG; microsurgery; supraclavicular artery perforator flap

Introduction

The supraclavicular flap has gained popularity in recent years as a reliable and easily harvested flap which is ideal for head and neck reconstruction [1]. Due to its tissue specificity, the supraclavicular flap provides an alternative to other free flaps in the reconstruction of defects of the head and neck [2,3].

In 1903, Toldt, an anatomist, first illustrated and named the arteria cervicalis superficialis. The artery originates from the thyrocervical trunk, exiting between the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles [1,4]. Kazanjian and Converse are credited with the first clinical application of this flap in 1949 [5-7]. The use of this flap had gone out of favor until the early 1990s. It was then that Norbert Pallua rediscovered the supraclavicular flap and popularized its use. Pallua et al. had used this flap for post burn neck contracture, as well as head and neck malignancies [8-12].

The supraclavicular flap is usually raised as a pedicled island or as a transposition flap. The donor site may either be closed directly or with a split skin graft, depending on the size of the flap, laxity of the skin of the supraclavicular and shoulder region, and the pre-expansion condition of the flap. The use of supraclavicular flap as a free flap was reported by Pallua, who used this flap as a free flap for hand and foot reconstruction in two patients [12]. It was also reported as a free flap for head reconstruction by Cordova et al. and Alves et al. [13,14].

The pedicle of this flap emerges from transverse cervical artery and is located in the triangle formed by the dorsal edge of the sternocleidomastoid muscle, the external jugular vein, and the medial part of the clavicle [5,15,16]. Anatomical variations have been described in the pathway of the dominant pedicle to the flap, which courses under the clavicle and turns upwards towards the skin. Due to the variations in the course of the pedicle, the length of the pedicled flap is variable.

The aim of this case report is to show (1) that the determination of the dominant pedicle may be aided with the use of indocyanine green angiography and (2) that the supraclavicular flap can be converted to a free flap if the dominant pedicle is unfavorable to a pedicled flap design.

Case Presentation

We describe the case of a 70-year-old female patient who had to undergo wide excision of a tumor with squamous cell carcinoma on the left cheek by an otolaryngologist. The reconstruction of the facial defect with a free supraclavicular flap was performed by a plastic surgery team in Sant Pau I Santa Creu hospital in Barcelona, Spain in January 2018.

The wide resection of the tumor resulted in a large soft tissue defect of the size of 8 x 9 cm. A left supraclavicular perforator flap was planned. The flap pedicle was identified by a handheld Doppler as a single perforator in the triangle outlined between sternocleidomastoid, clavicle and trapezius. The flap borders were marked having a length of 20 cm from the pedicle and width of 9 cm at the distal part to match the size of the defect (Figure 1).

An intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was performed before dissection, and more perforators were identified and marked (Figure 2). Dissection started from distal to proximal part of the flap in the subfascial plane.

 

Figure 1. Wide resection of the tumor resulted in a large soft tissue defect of the size of 8 x 9 cm. A left supraclavicular perforator flap was planned. The flap borders were marked having a length of 20 cm from the pedicle and width of 9 cm at the distal part to match the size of the defect.


 

Figure 2. An intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was performed before dissection, and more perforators were identified and marked.

 

The flap was raised on two pedicles consistent with the results showed by the indocyanine green angiography, one from supraclavicular vessels and the second from subclavicular region (Figure 3A). Using indocyanine green imaging, both pedicles were sequentially clamped and then released to check the vascularity and perfusion status of the flap. The supraclavicular vessel entered the flap at its proximal third. The infraclavicular pedicle had a bigger caliber and better pulsation than the supraclavicular pedicle but entered the flap in its middle third (Figure 3B-C).

 

Figure 3. (A) The flap was raised on two pedicles consistent with the results showed by the indocyanine green angiography, one from supraclavicular vessels and the second from subclavicular region. (B, C) Using indocyanine green angiography, both pedicles were sequentially clamped and then released to check the vascularity and perfusion status of the flap. The supraclavicular vessel entered the flap at its proximal third. The infraclavicular pedicle had a bigger caliber and better pulsation than the supraclavicular pedicle but entered the flap in its middle third.

 

Clinical examination and indocyanine green angiography showed that the subclavicular pedicle was dominant. The arc of rotation of the flap was limited, as was the reach of the pedicled flap. We therefore opted to convert it into a free flap. The proximal quarter of the flap was too narrow and not sufficiently perfused; hence it was discarded (Figure 4A). A branch of the ipsilateral facial artery and the facial vein were prepared as recipient vessels. The flap size was adjusted to match the size of the facial defect (8 x 9 cm). It was then inset on the defect, and the infraclavicular pedicle was anastomosed end-to-end to the facial vessels (Figure 4B). The donor site was closed at the proximal part and skin grafted at the distal part. The flap survived completely, and the wounds healed up uneventfully five weeks after surgery (Figure 4C).

 

Figure 4. (A) The subclavicular pedicle was dominant and the arc of rotation of the flap was limited. We therefore opted to convert it into a free flap. The proximal quarter of the flap was quite narrow and not sufficiently perfused; hence it was discarded. (B) A branch of the ipsilateral facial artery and the facial vein were prepared as recipient vessels. The flap size was adjusted to match the size of the facial defect (8 x 9 cm). It was then inset on the defect, and the infraclavicular pedicle was anastomosed end-to-end to the facial vessels. (C) The donor site was closed at the proximal part and skin grafted at the distal part. The flap survived completely, and the wounds healed up uneventfully five weeks after surgery.

Discussion

Radiological mapping of the pedicle and angiosomes of supraclavicular artery flap is useful but complex. Sheriff et al. [3] have compared six imaging modalities for identifying the pedicle and marking the perfusion zones of supraclavicular artery flap. Of these, intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was the most practical and accurate in identifying the vascular anatomy of the superficial vessels in real time, making the mapping of the pedicle and angiosomes reliable [3,17].

However, the ability of indocyanine green angiography in showing the full course of the pedicles and perforators is limited and depends on the amount of adipose tissue subjacent to the skin and the site of emergence of the vessels. As the depth of visualization of blood vessels by indocyanine green angiography is limited to approximately 2 cm [17], it could show the perforators sites precisely. However, it could not show the pathway of the pedicle deep in the tissue. It also did not show the course of the pedicle above or below the clavicle, and hence there was no change in the initial plan of supraclavicular flap to another type of flap.

In this case, the indocyanine green angiography was able to guide the conversion of the pedicled supraclavicular artery flap to a free supraclavicular flap for reconstruction of the facial defect caused by an unusual course of the dominant pedicle of the flap. The vast majority of articles on the supraclavicular flap in peer-reviewed literature discuss the pedicled design of the flap but there is little discussion about the use of the free flap design.

Conclusion

Intraoperative indocyanine green angiography before and during dissection may be useful in identification of the dominant perforator and pedicle pathways. It helps make a right decision in the ultimate flap design in order to avoid complications which might arise due to anatomic variations.

References

  1. Sheriff H, Garcia CV, Jaber S, et al. Supraclavicular artery island flap: Relation between length and distal end necrosis. Int Microsurg J 2018;2(1):5. [View Article]
  2. Sands TT, Martin JB, Simms E, Henderson MM, Friedlander PL, Chiu ES. Supraclavicular artery island flap innervation: Anatomical studies and clinical implications. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65(1):68-71. [View Article]
  3. Sheriff HO, Mahmood KA, Hamawandi N, et al. The supraclavicular artery perforator flap: A comparative study of imaging techniques used in preoperative mapping. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018;34(7):499-508. [View Article]
  4. Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL. Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: Indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;124(1):115-123. [View Article]
  5. Alves HR, Ishida LC, Ishida LH, et al. A clinical experience of the supraclavicular flap used to reconstruct head and neck defects in late-stage cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012;65(10):1350-1356. [View Article]
  6. Chan JWH, Wong C, Ward K, Saint-Cyr M, Chiu ES. Three- and four-dimensional computed tomographic angiography studies of the supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(2):525-531. [View Article]
  7. Kazanjian VH, Converse JM. The surgical treatment of facial injuries, 2 edn. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Company; 1959.
  8. Pallua N, Demir E. Postburn head and neck reconstruction in children with the fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg 2008;60(3):276-282. [View Article]
  9. Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A. The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;99(7):1878-1884; discussion 1885-1876. [View Article]
  10. Pallua N, Magnus Noah E. The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: An optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;105(3):842-851; discussion 852-844. [View Article]
  11. Pallua N, von Heimburg D. Pre-expanded ultra-thin supraclavicular flaps for (full-) face reconstruction with reduced donor-site morbidity and without the need for microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115(7):1837-1844; discussion 1845-1837. [View Article]
  12. Pallua N, Wolter TP. Moving forwards: The anterior supraclavicular artery perforator (a-sap) flap: A new pedicled or free perforator flap based on the anterior supraclavicular vessels. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013;66(4):489-496. [View Article]
  13. Alves HRN, de Faria JCM, Busnardo F, Cernea C, Rangel T, Gemperli R. Forehead reconstruction using supraclavicular flap with microsurgical technique: Free flap and a pedicle supercharged flap. JPRAS Open 2017;14:33-38. [View Article]
  14. Cordova A, Pirrello R, D'Arpa S, Jeschke J, Brenner E, Moschella F. Vascular anatomy of the supraclavicular area revisited: Feasibility of the free supraclavicular perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122(5):1399-1409. [View Article]
  15. Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK. The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: Applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013;139(11):1247-1255. [View Article]
  16. Wirtz NE, Khariwala SS. Update on the supraclavicular flap. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;25(5):439-444. [View Article]
  17. Liu DZ, Mathes DW, Zenn MR, Neligan PC. The application of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography in plastic surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2011;27(6):355-364. [View Article]

Editorial Information

Publication History

Received date: March 20, 2020
Accepted date: June 13, 2020
Published date: September 02, 2021

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study is in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

The study did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors report no financial or other conflict of interest relevant to this article, which is the intellectual property of the authors.

Copyright

© 2021 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY).

Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de Sant Pau i de la Santa Creu, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital de Sant Pau i de la Santa Creu, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de Sant Pau i de la Santa Creu, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, Sulaymaniyah Teaching Hospital, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq
Premier Plastic Surgery, Texas, USA
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de Sant Pau i de la Santa Creu, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hospital de Sant Pau i de la Santa Creu, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq

Address: Kirkuk Road, Sulaimani, Kurdistan Region, Iraq
Figure 1.JPG
Figure 1. Wide resection of the tumor resulted in a large soft tissue defect of the size of 8 x 9 cm. A left supraclavicular perforator flap was planned. The flap borders were marked having a length of 20 cm from the pedicle and width of 9 cm at the distal part to match the size of the defect.
Figure 2.JPG
Figure 2. An intraoperative indocyanine green angiography was performed before dissection, and more perforators were identified and marked.
Figure 3.JPG
Figure 3. (A) The flap was raised on two pedicles consistent with the results showed by the indocyanine green angiography, one from supraclavicular vessels and the second from subclavicular region. (B, C) Using indocyanine green angiography, both pedicles were sequentially clamped and then released to check the vascularity and perfusion status of the flap. The supraclavicular vessel entered the flap at its proximal third. The infraclavicular pedicle had a bigger caliber and better pulsation than the supraclavicular pedicle but entered the flap in its middle third.
Figure 4.JPG
Figure 4. (A) The subclavicular pedicle was dominant and the arc of rotation of the flap was limited. We therefore opted to convert it into a free flap. The proximal quarter of the flap was quite narrow and not sufficiently perfused; hence it was discarded. (B) A branch of the ipsilateral facial artery and the facial vein were prepared as recipient vessels. The flap size was adjusted to match the size of the facial defect (8 x 9 cm). It was then inset on the defect, and the infraclavicular pedicle was anastomosed end-to-end to the facial vessels. (C) The donor site was closed at the proximal part and skin grafted at the distal part. The flap survived completely, and the wounds healed up uneventfully five weeks after surgery.

Reviewer 1 Comments

  1. Because it was not an article of an original study, use of the "standard" form of a research article, with "routine" sections such as "Method", "Results”... was not suitable.
    ResponseThank you very much dear reviewer 1, for giving your precious time revising intensively this article. The original format of method, result and conclusion has been changed as requested by yourself. The result has been merged with the case presentation, page 2 of the manuscript, paragraph 4 and 5.
     
  2. The "Abstract" section was so long, jumble (again, it included an "Abstract" subsection, in addition to others such as method, results...) besides, it did not exactly match with the main document. Namely, in the end sentence, there was the adjective "extremely", while this word was not used in the main document.
    ResponseThe abstract has been shortened in to one paragraph as required and the original format of method, result and conclusion has been changed, adjusted, and summarized.
     
  3. Because of only based on the results of the one sole case, your statements in "Conclusion" section were not enough scientific objective evidence. The manner of presentation, as shown in the manuscript, could be somewhat misleading to readers. Conclusions should be presented as a subjective interpretation by the researchers, rather than as a definitive truth. I suggest the authors use “may” instead of “is” for the conclusion.
    ResponseIn conclusion section, the word (may and might) have been used instead of the word (is), page 3, first part.
     
  4. The captions of the figures 3b (an ICG fluorescence image) and 3c (a thermographic image) are the same as each other. They should be re-edited and should probably be combined to make the article tidier.
    ResponseAs it was also requested by other reviewers to reduce the number of figures and mix them to make the article tidier. We have revised accordingly.
     
  5. I found some minor issues regarding English usage in the manuscript. Using obscure sentence structure: The caption of the fig. 6 is obscure. Do you mean "the supraclavicular flap was prepared as a free one"? Or "the pedicle of the free supraclavicular flap"?
    ResponseThe Fig 6 after revision became Fig. 3 and the caption is inserted as: The Supraclavicular flap was prepared as a free flap.
     
  6. Using the passive aspect of verbs: The caption of the fig.1 should be rewritten into “Intraoperative markings: perforators were identified in the supraclavicular region, in a triangle lined by sternocleidomastoid, clavicle and trapezius." 
    ResponseThe figure legend has been revised accordingly.
     
  7. The caption of the fig. 3a should be rewritten into “Flap dissection was performed”.
    ResponseThe figure legend has been revised accordingly.
     
  8. Using marks: The slash mark in the word clusters "Barcelona/Spain should be replaced by a comma. 
    ResponseThis mistake corrected in page 1, first paragraph of the case presentation as: Sant Pau I Santa Creu hospital in Barcelona, Spain.
     
  9. Uppercase/lowercase error: The word “plastic” in the phrase “.... by a Plastic surgery team" ("Case presentation" section, the first paragraph) was indiscriminately capitalized.
    ResponseThis mistake corrected in page 1, first paragraph of the case presentation as: by a plastic surgery team.
     
  10. Using acronyms: You did not follow the rules on the use of acronyms and abbreviations (“minimum, defined where first used....). Namely, the phrase "Indocyanine Green (ICG) angiography" was repeated one time after the first. 
    ResponseAs requested by you the phrase "Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography" used only once from the beginning in the Abstract, line 5, and repeated as Acronym ICG angiography afterwards in the article.
     
  11. Using inappropriate words: The words "angiography" and "angiogram", which are two words with nearly the same meaning (but not completely synonym), are often interchangeably used in medical literature. However, sometimes this replacement is incorrect. Correctly, an "angiography" means as a test, a procedure, or a technique; and an "angiogram" means as a film or an image made by angiography. So, the phrase "A preoperative ICG angiogram was also performed" ("Case presentation" section, the second paragraph) should be rewritten into "A preoperative ICG angiography was also performed". 
    ResponseAfter revision, in the article the word angiography replaced the word angiogram when it was appropriate as requested, in case presentation paragraph 3,4, and 5, and also discussion paragraph 3 and 4, and in conclusion paragraph.
     
  12. Using words inconsistently: Although the words "subclavicular" and "infraclavicular" are two synonyms, it would be better we should consistently use either of them, especially in a short document. 
    ResponseThanks again for this recommendation and these two words "subclavicular" and "infraclavicular" used after revision interchangeably in case presentation, paragraph 4 and 5.

Reviewer 2 Comments

  1. Some issues should be further clarified. In the text you commented on fig 2 "A preoperative ICG angiogram was also performed and perforators were marked again." On the figure caption however, you stated it was an intra-operative evaluation of the supraclavicular pedicle. Please clarify the above. Was ICG used to locate the infraclavicular perforator preoperatively before the incisions were made? Were both perforators identified with Doppler (if so, this should be clarified in the text)? Was the infraclavicular perforator discovered during the dissection, as this is not the usual exit of where the perforator is located. This explanation will be useful under the results section and will greatly aid in our knowledge of the anatomy and dissection of this flap.
    ResponseThank you very much for taking time revising our article and kindly recommending and requesting more information. The issue of one or more perforators identification by Doppler and ICG angiography, whether intraoperative before or after incision, and whether they are the same or different perforators, all are clarified as requested both in the manuscript and in Figure captions as appropriate after revision.
     
  2. When the infraclavicular vessel was clamped intra operatively, there was a decrease in perfusion on ICG. Was the same evidence noted clinically? 
    ResponseThe answer is yes, and it was clarified and written in case presentation, paragraph 4 and 5 after revision.
     
  3. Please correct the comment in the abstract where it was noted the donor site was closed primarily.
    ResponseThanks again for this recommendation, but because it was requested by the editor and 2 reviewers to shorten the Abstract, then eventually that part has been also removed in the Abstract after revision, but it was noted and clarified in the last 2 sentences of paragraph 5 of case presentation in page 2 of the manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Comments

  1. I failed to find any new information from this paper. Most of the things have been described before. I suggest the authors clarify the lessons or experiences that may be learnt from the case report in the Discussion section.
    ResponseThank you very much dear reviewer 3, for taking time revising our article and kindly recommending and requesting more information. After revision of the article, more information and clarification have been inserted regarding the lessons and take home message from this article, in paragraph 3 and 4 of the discussion page 2 and also in conclusion page 3 of the manuscript.
     
  2. I found there are too many figures. Some of the figures are blurred (4a for example) and should be replaced with a clear one.
    ResponseThanks again dear reviewer 3, as requested by yourself and 2 more reviewers to reduce the number of figures, then some of the figures removed including Fig 4a, and some of them mixed to make the article tidier.

Reviewer 4 Comments

  1. The authors presented a case report of a free supraclavicular flap for reconstruction of cheek defect, aided by ICG fluorescence imaging. The title was adequately representing the whole article contents. The abstract was sufficiently representing the whole manuscript, in a good text length. The introduction gave a logical take off for the main problems arisen. Great introduction on the history of supraclavicular usage through the century.
    Response Thank you very much for taking your valuable time revising our article and kindly advising, recommending and requesting more information.
     
  2. However, there remains several points that need to be clarified. First, is it necessary to include brief explanation of the use of ICG for flap design?
    ResponseIn the first place we wanted to insert more information about the ICG for better clarification, but because this goes as a case report and should be kept shorter than original articles as recommended by the editor and some reviewers, for that reason unfortunately we couldn’t insert more information about ICG.
     
  3. Please confirm if the perforator identified by Doppler were the perforator selected by ICG aid. 
    ResponseAfter revision the issue of one or more perforators identification by Doppler and ICG angiography, whether intraoperative before or after incision, and whether they are the same or different perforators, all are clarified as requested both in the manuscript and in Figure captions as appropriate.
     
  4. Please provide size and length of the planned flap in text, and if there were any changes after ICG evaluation. 
    ResponseMore information regarding the marking and size, and whether part was removed and discarded after the ICG inserted after the revision in paragraph 2 and 5 of case presentation in page 2 of the manuscript.
     
  5. It is obvious that the dominant perforator can be seen from the initial ICG prior to dissection. Please add some explanations why the authors still proceed to dissect it, rather than converting to other free flap (SCIP, ALT, etc). 
    ResponseThanks again for this observation, after the revision more information inserted why the initial plan was not changed to another flap in paragraph 3 of the discussion in page 3.
     
  6. Did the authors discard any excess tissue from the free flaps? It seems that the flap dissected too big for the defects.
    ResponseThank you for your comments. Part of the flap discarded, and that information was inserted in the manuscript in the part of case presentation in page 3.
     
  7. In the reviewer opinion, the main take home message is to perform ICG evaluation prior to dissection, to avoid what the authors encountering in this case (converting to free flaps, add more operating time and resources).
    ResponseThank you very much dear reviewer 4. After revision of the article, more information and clarification have been inserted regarding the lessons and take home message from this article, in paragraph 3 and 4 of the discussion page 2 and also in conclusion page 3 of the manuscript.
     
  8. Excellent figures quality overall. Figures 1, 2 should be in one figure and put side by side (i.e., Figure 1A and 1B); Figures 3, 4, and 5 should be combined in one figure (i.e., Figure 2A, 2B, and 2C).
    ResponseExactly as requested by yourself here and in note no. 11, and recommended by some of other reviewers, changes in the figures were done accordingly.
     
  9. Figures 7 is not clear, please provide arrows or mark to accentuate which one is importants. 
    ResponseDue to the big number of figures, we obliged to remove Fig. 7 on the row of the document submission section, the figure with ICG which was showing the pedicle and was not very clear. But the Fig. 7 on the article which showed the wound closure is now Fig. 4, with the caption of “The flap transfer and inset”.
     
  10. Please add information that Figures 8 and 9 is performed with clamping of distal perforators.
    ResponseAfter revision and adjustment the figures that showed ICG during dissection and alternative clamping of the pedicles now became Fig.2 A, B, and C, with more information in the captions and case presentation paragraph 3, 4, and 5 in page 2.
     
  11. Figures 7 and 8 could be combined into one for comparison. In general, please limit your figures as this is case reports, 5-6 figures are acceptable for a case report.
    ResponseThank you very much again for giving your precious time revising intensively this article, as I mentioned in note no.8 and referred to this one there as well, they are combined in Fig.2 A, B, and C for better comparison. Again some figures removed as recommended to reduce the number of the figures to 5 Figures as submission.

Editor's Comments

  1. In accordance with the format of Case Report, the Abstract section needs to be summarized into one paragraph.
    ResponseThank you very much for taking time revising our article, and we appreciate your effort. The abstract has been shortened in to one paragraph as required and the original format of method, result and conclusion has been changed and summarized.
     
  2. The Result section should be merged into Case Presentation section.
    ResponseThe result has been merged with the case presentation, page 2 of the manuscript, paragraph 4 and 5.

Sheriff H, Vega Garcia C, Garcia Lorenzo J, Lopez Fernandez S, Shahab Kareem S, Hankins C, Masia J, Fernandez Garrido M. Indocyanine green angiography in salvage planning: From pedicled supraclavicular flap to free supraclavicular flap. Int Microsurg J. 2021;5(1):4. https://doi.org/10.24983/scitemed.imj.2021.00145