Search Submit
Close

Microsurgical Lymphatic Reconstruction for Refractory Chylous Ascites in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Case Report and Literature Review

International Microsurgery Journal. 2025;9(1):2
DOI: 10.24983/scitemed.imj.2025.00197
Article Type: Review Article

Abstract

Objective: Refractory chylous ascites in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a rare and challenging condition with limited management guidance. Most published reports are isolated cases, offering minimal insight into its clinical profile. In the absence of established surgical strategies when conservative treatments fail, this work provides the first comprehensive review of SLE-associated refractory chylous ascites to establish an evidence-based therapeutic framework. It also documents the first successful application of a lymphatic bypass procedure in this context.

Methods: A 36-year-old man with SLE developed refractory chylous ascites after a 13-year disease course. Prior treatments, including immunosuppressive therapy, vascular embolization, and laparoscopic surgery, failed to control fluid accumulation. The patient subsequently underwent an innovative microsurgical procedure that combined a deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap (DIE-LCF) with a gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap (GE-VLN) to establish an alternative lymphatic drainage route, referred to as the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass. To clarify optimal management strategies for this rare complication, a comprehensive review of 19 cases was conducted, including the present case.

Results: The patient achieved complete resolution of chylous ascites within one week and was discharged on postoperative day 10. No recurrence, flap ischemia, or abdominal wall herniation was observed throughout the one-year follow-up period. Literature review demonstrated a predominance of female patients (84%), with a median age of 38 years. Chylothorax was reported in 79% of cases. Corticosteroids were administered in 95% of patients, often in combination with immunomodulatory agents. Among the 11 patients treated with medical therapy alone, primarily corticosteroids and other immunosuppressants, only 2 achieved complete remission, corresponding to a success rate of 18%. This modest efficacy underscores the limitations of pharmacologic therapy in addressing the multifactorial pathophysiology of SLE-associated chylous ascites. Of the 19 cases reviewed, 8 patients received additional surgical interventions. Among the 7 who underwent conventional procedures such as paracentesis, peritoneovenous shunting, or thoracic duct repair, only 3 achieved complete remission, yielding a 43% success rate. In contrast, the present case demonstrated complete and sustained remission following DIE-GE lymphatic bypass. This outcome raised the overall complete remission rate among surgically managed patients to 50% (4 of 8). The favorable response observed suggests that DIE-GE lymphatic bypass may represent a promising microsurgical option when both standard immunosuppression and conventional surgical approaches prove inadequate.

Conclusion: This study introduces the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass, a novel microsurgical technique for reconstructing lymphatic drainage. Its use is supported by a successfully treated case and a comprehensive literature review. The approach achieved both rapid resolution of ascites and sustained anatomical stability, providing preliminary evidence of therapeutic potential and a foundation for future clinical adoption.

Keywords

  • Chylothorax; immunosuppressive agents; inflammation; lymph nodes; lymphatic vessels; microsurgery; reconstructive surgical procedures; vascularized composite allotransplantation

Introduction

Chylous ascites is characterized by the accumulation of triglyceride-rich, milky fluid in the peritoneal cavity. This fluid contains high concentrations of proteins, immunoglobulins, and essential nutrients. When present in large volumes, it can lead to immunosuppression, malnutrition, and electrolyte imbalances. The condition most commonly arises from obstruction or disruption of lymphatic drainage. Common causes include trauma, surgery, malignancy, infection, cirrhosis, and congenital lymphatic anomalies. In adults, malignancy is the leading etiology, followed by postoperative complications, inflammatory disorders, and infections. Mortality rates vary depending on the underlying causes, ranging from 40% to 70% [1–3].

Therapeutic Limits in SLE Chylous Ascites
Chylous ascites associated with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is exceptionally rare and poses significant challenges in therapeutic management. Most published reports are limited to isolated cases, offering minimal insight into the clinical course, treatment response, and long-term prognosis. Conservative management generally includes immunosuppressive therapy, parenteral nutrition, and repeated paracentesis. These interventions aim to reduce lymphatic leakage and preserve nutritional status. However, such strategies frequently fail to achieve durable disease control. Although surgical intervention may be considered in refractory cases, its indications and clinical efficacy remain inadequately defined. These limitations highlight the need for more robust, evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Lymphatic Bypass in SLE Chylous Ascites
Given the limited efficacy of conventional therapies, microsurgical reconstruction has emerged as a potential strategy to reestablish lymphatic drainage in refractory cases. Ciudad et al. [4] previously described a novel approach combining a deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap (DIE-LCF) with a gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap (GE-VLN), forming an alternative route for chylous fluid diversion. For clarity, we refer to this technique as the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass. It demonstrated clinical success in two non-SLE patients, one with refractory chylous ascites following kidney transplantation and another with lymphatic injury secondary to oncologic treatment. However, the original procedure left the fascial opening unclosed, raising concerns about postoperative herniation. To date, this technique has not been applied to cases involving autoimmune-mediated lymphatic inflammation, and its feasibility, safety, and required technical modifications in this context remain unestablished.

Novel Strategy and Literature Integration
We report the first successful application of the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass in a 36-year-old male with SLE-associated refractory chylous ascites unresponsive to conventional treatment modalities. This case offers preliminary clinical evidence supporting the feasibility of this approach under autoimmune-inflammatory conditions. However, a single case alone cannot resolve persistent uncertainties in surgical decision-making, particularly when conservative strategies fail. Existing literature remains fragmented, comprising primarily isolated case reports without comparative synthesis. To address this knowledge gap, we conducted a critical appraisal of previously reported cases and present the first comparative analysis focused on SLE-associated chylous ascites.

Study Aim
This study aims to address the current lack of evidence by introducing a viable and innovative surgical alternative for patients with SLE-associated refractory chylous ascites. It seeks to establish preliminary clinical support for the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass as a therapeutic option. Such foundational evidence may inform future case series and support the development of standardized surgical protocols for this rare clinical entity.

Case Presentation

A 36-year-old male presented with refractory chylous ascites. He had a 13-year history of lupus nephritis associated with SLE. A multidisciplinary team conducted a comprehensive evaluation and confirmed an etiological association between the ascites and underlying SLE. Despite multiple immunosuppressive regimens, supportive care, and conventional surgical interventions, the chylous fluid persisted. Following the failure of standard therapies, the patient was referred to the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery for further management.

Refractory Clinical Course Prior to Referral
Five months before referral, the patient underwent thoracotomy with ligation of a lymphatic leak to treat chylothorax, followed by pleurodesis. This procedure successfully resolved the pleural effusion. However, he subsequently developed progressive abdominal distension, which led to the diagnosis of chylous ascites. Conservative management comprising immunosuppressive therapy, serial paracenteses, a medium-chain triglyceride-based diet, and total parenteral nutrition failed to achieve clinical improvement.

Six weeks later, conventional lymphangiography with glue embolization was performed at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra. Follow-up imaging conducted two weeks afterward confirmed persistent chyle leakage. Subsequent magnetic resonance lymphangiography was nondiagnostic, as no contrast uptake was observed following injection into the regional lymph nodes.

Two months before the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass, the patient underwent laparoscopic ligation of the identified chylous leak along the parietal peritoneum. The procedure failed to resolve the ascites. Following this unsuccessful intervention, he received supplemental albumin and additional supportive care. Ongoing fluid accumulation prompted referral to the plastic and reconstructive surgery team for evaluation of surgical candidacy for lymphatic bypass reconstruction.

Surgical Technique and Procedure
Due to persistent ascites despite multiple prior interventions, the patient underwent surgical management with the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass under general anesthesia. This procedure was designed to establish an alternative route for chylous fluid drainage by connecting two autologous, lymphatic-rich flaps. The overall surgical concept is illustrated in Figure 1.

As shown in Figure 1A, the recipient flap (GE-VLN) was harvested from the greater curvature of the stomach and oriented cranially. The donor flap (DIE-LCF), based on the deep inferior epigastric vessels and containing lymphatic cable tissue, was harvested from the lower abdomen and oriented caudally. After both flaps were elevated, microvascular anastomosis was performed to create a continuous lymphatic bypass pathway between them (Figure 1B). The technical aspects of flap harvest and preparation are outlined below.

Figure 1. Schematic of DIE-GE bypass for chylous ascites. (A) Preoperative image showing the cranial GE-VLN harvested from the greater curvature of the stomach and the caudal DIE-LCF harvested from the lower abdomen, both depicted in orange. Green circles indicate lymph nodes; blue and red lines represent lymphatic channels and vascular pedicles. Arrows show the planned direction of flap transfer. (B) Postoperative image showing anastomosis of the two flaps to establish a bypass route for chylous fluid drainage into systemic circulation (green arrow). The red X marks the ligation site of the distal deep inferior epigastric vessels near the bifurcation of the external iliac vessels. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.

Harvesting of DIE-LCF and GE-VLN flaps
The flap-harvesting procedure is illustrated in Figure 2. Following a midline abdominal incision, the left rectus sheath was opened below the umbilicus. The rectus abdominis muscle was retracted to expose the deep inferior epigastric vessels, which were carefully dissected and mobilized. Adjacent adipofascial tissue containing lymph nodes and lymphatic channels was isolated with precision. The deep inferior epigastric vessels were ligated and transected near their origin at the external iliac vessels. The adipofascial tissue was then elevated on its vascular pedicle to form the DIE-LCF flap (Figure 2B).

Next, the rectus abdominis midline was opened to access the peritoneal cavity, allowing evacuation of approximately 4,000 mL of chylous fluid (Figure 2C). Dissection proceeded along the greater curvature of the stomach, where the left gastroepiploic vessels were ligated near the spleen. A GE-VLN flap was harvested based on the right gastroepiploic vessels (Figure 2D). To ensure adequate inclusion of lymph nodes and associated lymphatic channels, the flap was transected at least 5 cm distal to the vascular pedicle.

Figure 2. Operative findings and sequential harvest of lymphatic flaps for DIE-GE bypass reconstruction. (A) Preoperative image showing abdominal distension and placement of a drainage catheter for continuous evacuation of chylous fluid. (B) Intraoperative image showing harvest of the DIE-LCF along the lateral border of the left rectus abdominis. (C) Intraoperative image revealing milky chylous fluid accumulated within the peritoneal cavity. (D) Image after harvest showing the cranial GE-VLN and the caudal DIE-LCF prepared for transfer. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.

Vascular anastomosis and flap inset
Following flap harvest, the GE-VLN was confirmed to provide sufficient pedicle length to reach the DIE-LCF without undue tension. It was introduced into the retrorectus plane through a cruciate incision in the left posterior rectus sheath. The DIE-LCF was rotated cranially to approximate the vascular pedicles (Figure 3A). Arterial anastomosis between the deep inferior epigastric artery and the left gastroepiploic artery was performed using 9-0 nylon sutures. Venous anastomosis was subsequently completed with a 2 mm coupler device (Figure 3B).

The distal ends of both flaps were loosely secured to reduce the risk of vascular kinking. To further prevent postoperative herniation, the flap was anchored to the parietal peritoneum within the abdominal cavity. Surgical drains were placed at the DIE-LCF pedicle site and within the peritoneal cavity. The rectus sheath was closed using 1-0 nylon sutures, followed by meticulous layered skin closure.

Figure 3. Intraoperative anastomosis and postoperative findings of DIE-GE bypass. (A) Intraoperative image showing the left posterior rectus plane before vascular anastomosis, with the cranial GE-VLN and caudal DIE-LCF positioned for connection. (B) Intraoperative close-up view showing the anastomosis sites, including arterial anastomosis (cranial) and venous anastomosis (caudal) completed with a coupler, both clearly visualized. (C) Postoperative image at one year showing reduced abdominal girth, absence of drainage catheters, and a visible midline scar. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.

Postoperative Care and Follow-up
Postoperative management was coordinated by a multidisciplinary team including specialists in critical care, clinical nutrition, gastrointestinal surgery, and plastic surgery. During the first postoperative week, the volume of chylous ascites progressively declined, permitting timely removal of surgical drains. The patient resumed oral intake without difficulty and was discharged in stable condition on postoperative day 10.

Following discharge, the patient maintained a high-protein diet and consistently used compression stockings, resulting in gradual resolution of lower limb and scrotal edema. At six months postoperatively, he was hospitalized for severe pneumonia at a local facility. During this admission, two episodes of localized intra-abdominal fluid accumulation were identified and drained. Biochemical analysis revealed serous, nonchylous fluid with negative triglyceride levels, confirming the absence of recurrent chylous ascites.

At the one-year follow-up, abdominal computed tomography (Figure 4) confirmed sustained resolution of chylous ascites, with no evidence of recurrence. However, mild residual pleural effusion and persistent lower limb edema were observed, findings suggestive of ongoing chronic hypoalbuminemia and active SLE. Serum albumin levels, initially 2 g/dL prior to surgery, transiently improved to 3 g/dL following perioperative supplementation but declined to 2 g/dL by the one-year evaluation.

Overall, the patient remained clinically stable, with no signs of flap ischemia, perfusion compromise, or abdominal wall herniation. Owing to geographic constraints and limited transportation access, follow-up beyond the one-year mark was conducted primarily through structured telephone consultations.

Figure 4. Preoperative and one-year postoperative abdominal CT demonstrating resolution of chylous ascites. (A) Preoperative axial CT image showing moderate to severe ascites, with large homogeneous low-density fluid collections surrounding intra-abdominal organs. (B) Preoperative coronal CT image further illustrating the bilateral distribution of ascitic fluid. (C) One-year postoperative axial CT image showing complete resolution of ascites and restoration of normal intra-abdominal anatomy. (D) One-year postoperative coronal CT image confirming absence of fluid accumulation and clear visualization of abdominal structures. CT, computed tomography.

Review of Chylous Ascites in SLE

Methods
To examine the clinical features, treatment modalities, and outcomes of chylous ascites associated with SLE, an integrative literature review was conducted. Available case reports and clinical studies were synthesized to construct a preliminary evidence-based framework to guide clinical decision-making.

Data were retrieved from multiple medical databases and open-access platforms. Eligible materials included peer-reviewed case reports, case series, and narrative studies. Citation tracing and conference abstracts were reviewed to enhance data completeness. The search strategy employed combinations of terms including "systemic lupus erythematosus," "chylous ascites," and "chylothorax," and encompassed all relevant publications available through March 2025. Non-English sources were included if clinically interpretable.

Inclusion criteria comprised: (1) a confirmed diagnosis of SLE; (2) documentation of chylous ascites with clinical or laboratory confirmation; and (3) reported data on presentation, treatment, or outcomes. Exclusion criteria included: (1) cases reporting chylothorax without ascites; (2) reports lacking essential information; and (3) chylous ascites unrelated to SLE. Eighteen published cases met the criteria and were included alongside the present case, resulting in 19 cases for analysis (Table 1) [5–14].

Data extraction focused on demographics (age, sex, and geographic distribution), clinical characteristics (including chylothorax), therapeutic interventions, and outcomes. Extracted data were verified against original texts to ensure consistency. Descriptive statistics and cross-sectional comparisons were used to identify trends in epidemiologic patterns and treatment responses.

Given the rarity of this condition and the predominance of single-case literature, a narrative review methodology was adopted. Although not a formal systematic review, this integrative analysis was conducted with methodological discipline, transparency, and internal consistency to ensure the reliability and clinical relevance of its findings. This approach aims to provide pragmatic insights into the management of SLE-associated chylous ascites and to inform future research on this rare but clinically significant complication.

Epidemiology
Among the 19 cases of SLE-associated chylous ascites included in this analysis, 15 cases (79%) were accompanied by concurrent chylothorax. This observation suggests that SLE-related lymphatic dysfunction frequently manifests as multicompartimental chyle leakage.

The majority of patients were female (84%, 16 of 19), aligning with the well-established female predominance in SLE. Patient age ranged from 23 to 93 years, with a median of 38 years, indicating that this complication can arise across a wide age spectrum.

The largest proportion of cases originated from China (8 of 19, 42%), followed by South Korea and India (2 of 19 each, 11%). Additional cases were reported from Tunisia, Taiwan, Argentina, Turkey, the United States, Croatia, and Japan, each contributing one case (5%).

Conservative Management
Immunosuppressive therapy remains the foundation of treatment for SLE-associated chylous ascites. Corticosteroids were employed as first-line agents in 18 of 19 cases (95%). Additional immunosuppressants were selected according to disease severity and organ involvement, including hydroxychloroquine (7 of 19, 37%), cyclophosphamide (5 of 19, 26%), and mycophenolate mofetil (3 of 19, 16%). In refractory cases, cyclosporine (2 of 19, 11%) and experimental modalities such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (1 of 19, 5%) were administered, reflecting a growing interest in targeted immunomodulation.

Supportive interventions, such as dietary modification with medium-chain triglyceride supplementation, were described in only one case (5%), suggesting that nutritional strategies remain underutilized in routine clinical practice.

Despite the central role of immunosuppression, outcomes with conservative therapy alone appear limited. Among the 11 patients managed exclusively with medical treatment, only 2 achieved complete remission, corresponding to a success rate of 18%. These findings underscore the potential inadequacy of immunosuppression alone in addressing the multifactorial pathophysiology of SLE-associated chylous ascites, particularly in the presence of persistent lymphatic obstruction and chronic inflammation.

For refractory cases, a multimodal approach may be warranted. Combining immunosuppressive therapy with nutritional optimization and lymphatic reconstructive procedures may improve therapeutic response and support sustained clinical remission.

Surgical Treatment
Of the 19 patients included in this review, 8 (42%) underwent surgical intervention in addition to immunosuppressive therapy. Among these, 7 received conventional procedures such as paracentesis, peritoneovenous shunting, or thoracic duct repair. However, only 3 of these 7 patients achieved complete remission, yielding a success rate of 43%. Although this represents a modest improvement over conservative therapy alone, the overall effectiveness of traditional surgical strategies remains limited. These findings underscore the difficulty of resolving lymphatic obstruction in SLE using localized or symptom-targeted interventions.

In contrast, the present case (Case 19 in Table 1) demonstrated complete resolution of chylous ascites within one week following DIE-GE lymphatic bypass. No recurrence or hernia-related complications were observed throughout the one-year follow-up period, and the patient's clinical condition remained stable. This successful outcome increased the complete remission rate for combined medical and surgical management from 43% to 50% (4 of 8 cases). This favorable course suggests that a systemically oriented lymphatic bypass may offer advantages over conventional focal interventions, particularly in cases involving diffuse or inflammatory lymphatic disruption associated with autoimmune disease.

The DIE-GE lymphatic bypass offers a novel surgical strategy for managing refractory chylous ascites in patients with SLE. By correcting both anatomical disruption and lymphatic dysfunction, it provides a promising foundation for advancing surgical care in autoimmune-related lymphatic disorders.

Discussion

Current Case Analysis
Chylous fluid accumulation in the peritoneal, pleural, or pericardial cavities is often driven by elevated intraluminal pressure within central lymphatic conduits. This increase in pressure typically results from structural obstruction of major lymphatic channels, such as the lumbar trunks, cisterna chyli, and thoracic duct. These features are characteristic of central conducting lymphatic anomaly, a condition marked by impaired lymphatic transport.

In rare instances, SLE may contribute to such obstructions through chronic autoimmune-mediated inflammation. This inflammatory process can lead to progressive narrowing or dysfunction of central lymphatic pathways. As a result, pathological chyle leakage may occur, contributing to the complex lymphatic manifestations observed in select patients with SLE [8,9].

Direct lymphangiography is a valuable diagnostic modality for assessing thoracic duct patency and identifying outflow obstruction, thereby informing the feasibility of surgical decompression and symptom management strategies [12]. In the present case, however, lymphangiography did not demonstrate opacification of the thoracic duct, and no definitive anatomical obstruction was observed on prior imaging. These findings raise the possibility that the chylous ascites may be attributable to diffuse microlymphatic dysfunction, rather than to a discrete anatomical blockage.

Challenges in conservative management
Although the treatment of chylous ascites is well established [1,15], cases associated with SLE remain rare. This limited clinical experience hampers diagnostic precision and constrains the development of standardized therapeutic strategies. The present case illustrates the persistent challenges encountered during management of this uncommon condition.

The patient exhibited minimal response to multiple conservative interventions, including immunosuppressive therapy, dietary modification, and serial paracenteses, none of which achieved durable clinical benefit. A subsequent attempt at laparoscopic ligation of the suspected chyle leak was also unsuccessful [16]. While the Denver shunt has been reported as a palliative option, its limited long-term efficacy and risks such as infection and thrombosis diminished its clinical appeal [17]. The patient therefore declined this intervention.

Thoracic duct embolization has been proposed as a targeted treatment for proximal chyle leakage [18]. However, in this case, the procedure could not be performed. During direct lymphangiography, contrast failed to ascend from the inguinal lymph nodes, precluding thoracic duct opacification and obstructing both diagnostic and therapeutic access.

This scenario underscores the limitations of conventional approaches, particularly when central lymphatic anatomy cannot be adequately visualized or when diffuse microlymphatic dysfunction is present. In cases associated with SLE, such challenges are further complicated by chronic autoimmune inflammation. These observations highlight the pressing need for innovative, mechanism-based interventions capable of addressing complex lymphatic dysfunction in refractory disease.

Redefining surgical strategy
Given the limitations of conventional treatment, the surgical management of SLE-associated chylous ascites warrants fundamental reassessment. Strategies must be adapted to the condition’s multifactorial pathophysiology and immunological complexity. For cases involving distal thoracic duct obstruction, thoracic duct to venous bypass has been proposed as a viable option [19]. In the present patient, however, the presumed disruption was proximal, beyond the anatomical reach of this technique.

When chyle leakage is anatomically localized, intra-abdominal lymphovenous anastomosis may serve as an alternative [20]. In this case, however, repeated paracenteses resulted in bacterial peritonitis, rendering microsurgical peritoneovenous bypass contraindicated due to the heightened infection risk [21].

These limitations highlight the need for innovative surgical solutions that balance anatomical versatility with immunological safety. Techniques that restore lymphatic flow without requiring precise leak localization may offer greater therapeutic efficacy. The DIE-GE lymphatic bypass performed in this case exemplifies such an approach and points toward a promising surgical direction for refractory chylous ascites in SLE.

Conceptual basis for innovation
In response to the multifaceted therapeutic limitations in managing SLE-associated chylous ascites, this study explored a novel surgical strategy centered on microsurgical reconstruction of lymphatic outflow. Acknowledging the limited efficacy of both conservative medical approaches and anatomically localized surgical interventions, we adapted the principles of vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) to address diffuse lymphatic dysfunction within an inflamed immunological environment.

VLNT is a well-established treatment for limb lymphedema, where transplanted lymph nodes facilitate both lymphatic drainage and local immunoregulation [22]. Extending this paradigm, we employed the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass as a modified VLNT technique tailored to the autoimmune context of SLE. Drawing from the original approach described by Ciudad et al. [4], the procedure was structurally refined to optimize anatomic integration, reduce perioperative risks, and enhance functional outcomes in the setting of chronic inflammatory lymphatic compromise.

Optimizing flap inset
The DIE-GE lymphatic bypass was initially developed for non-SLE cases of lymphatic obstruction. By diverting chyle into the extraperitoneal circulation, the technique bypasses intra-abdominal lymphatic blockages and facilitates sustained drainage [4]. Building on this foundation, we introduced technical refinements to address pathological features common in SLE, such as chronic inflammation, tissue fragility, and impaired wound healing. In this case, morbid obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m²) further increased the risk of postoperative herniation, necessitating a modified approach to flap inset and fixation that prioritized anatomical stability and long-term structural integrity.

To mitigate these risks, a cruciate incision was fashioned in the posterior rectus sheath at the junction of the upper and middle thirds of the rectus abdominis. The opening was precisely tailored to allow atraumatic passage of the GE-VLN pedicle while minimizing dead space that could predispose to displacement or instability. The retrorectus plane was dissected to a sufficient lateral extent to accommodate the flap without inducing compressive stress.

To prevent prolapse or torsion, the flap construct was securely anchored to both the parietal peritoneum and the rectus sheath. The posterior rectus sheath was loosely reapproximated several centimeters above and below the cruciate incision to minimize tension at the suture line. The anterior rectus sheath was then closed in layered fashion using standard techniques, reinforcing abdominal wall integrity and reducing the risk of postoperative ventral hernia.

In standard surgical practice, intestinal stomas are routinely passed through the rectus musculature without compromising vascular integrity, supporting the anatomical feasibility of this region. Extrapolating from this principle, the retrorectus plane was considered unlikely to impose significant compressive risk on the flap. However, in patients with SLE, poor tissue resilience markedly increases the risk of incisional herniation if fascial closure is incomplete. These considerations underscored the necessity of adopting a modified inset technique.

The refined approach appeared effective, resulting in sustained resolution of ascites without radiologic evidence of herniation. No abdominal bulging or discomfort was reported during follow-up, supporting the structural soundness of the modified flap inset strategy.

Proposed drainage mechanisms
Findings from this case, together with prior reports, indicate that the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass ameliorates SLE-associated chylous ascites through multiple complementary mechanisms. These synergistic effects may account for the clinical improvements observed in the setting of autoimmune-mediated lymphatic dysfunction. Specifically, the therapeutic benefit appears to arise from three principal mechanisms: mechanical restoration of lymphatic drainage, local immunomodulation, and the promotion of lymphangiogenesis. Each is elaborated below.

The primary mechanism involves the reestablishment of an alternative lymphatic drainage pathway. Chylous fluid within the peritoneal cavity is redirected into the lymphoid tissue of the GE-VLN flap and subsequently drained into the deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic venous systems via microvascular anastomoses. The relatively high-pressure arterial inflow from the gastroepiploic artery is hypothesized to augment lymphatic flow within the DIE-LCF, thereby facilitating the bypass of obstructed intra-abdominal lymphatics and enhancing systemic chyle clearance [4,23].

The second mechanism pertains to immunomodulation. The vascularized lymphoid tissue within the GE-VLN flap has been shown to promote anti-inflammatory cytokine expression, particularly interleukin 10, while concurrently suppressing proinflammatory mediators such as tumor necrosis factor alpha [24]. This localized immunoregulatory effect is especially pertinent in SLE, a condition characterized by chronic systemic inflammation and immune dysregulation. In such settings, the long-term patency and functional stability of the drainage pathway may depend on sustained immunomodulatory support. Unlike previous applications in patients with lymphatic disruption from renal transplantation or malignancy-related interventions [4], individuals with SLE may derive unique benefit from the flap’s intrinsic capacity to modulate immune responses, thereby offering additional therapeutic advantage.

The third mechanism involves lymphangiogenesis. The transplanted lymphatic-rich tissue within the GE-VLN flap may stimulate the formation of new lymphatic channels, potentially through the upregulation of lymphangiogenic mediators such as vascular endothelial growth factor C [4,23]. This regenerative process could enhance microlymphatic circulation and reinforce the long-term integrity of lymphovenous connections, thereby improving fluid clearance and lowering the risk of recurrence.

The DIE-GE lymphatic bypass appears to exert its therapeutic effects through multiple synergistic mechanisms. In this case, ascites resolved completely within one week postoperatively. Follow-up imaging confirmed the absence of herniation or flap ischemia, reinforcing the feasibility of this approach for autoimmune-mediated lymphatic disorders.

DIE-GE Lymphatic Bypass: SLE vs. Non-SLE
Since its introduction by Ciudad et al. [4], the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass has been applied only in two non-SLE cases involving mechanical lymphatic obstruction after renal transplantation or cancer therapy. In contrast, SLE-associated chylous ascites presents added complexity due to chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and poor tissue healing. This case represents the first successful adaptation of the procedure in an autoimmune setting, extending its potential use beyond purely mechanical causes. A comparative analysis of SLE and non-SLE cases, summarized in Table 2, highlights key disease-specific challenges and technical refinements, offering guidance for broader clinical application in complex lymphatic disorders.

Customized technique design
In non-SLE cases (Cases 2 and 3 in Table 2), the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass was performed for chylous ascites secondary to surgical or therapy-induced lymphatic obstruction, with surgical priorities focused on flap perfusion and abdominal wall preservation. Microvascular anastomoses were completed using 10-0 nylon, and a small gap was left in the anterior sheath to prevent pedicle compression, with no herniation observed over two years. In contrast, the SLE case required tailored modifications to address systemic inflammation and poor healing. The GE-VLN flap was inset into the retrorectus plane via a cruciate incision, secured with full fascial closure and peritoneal anchoring to ensure structural stability. These adjustments underscore the importance of etiology-specific strategies in optimizing surgical outcomes.

Pathophysiological challenges
Postoperative management in lymphatic surgery is shaped not only by etiology but also by systemic factors such as immune status, tissue resilience, and healing capacity. In non-SLE cases, strategies like leaving a small fascial gap reduce pedicle compression but may increase hernia risk, though no such complications have been reported to date. SLE poses greater challenges due to chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, and poor wound healing, necessitating reinforced fixation and tension control during flap inset. In this case, persistent hypoalbuminemia and edema further prolonged recovery. These factors highlight the need for an integrated approach combining immune modulation, nutritional support, and structural optimization to improve outcomes in autoimmune lymphatic reconstruction.

Postoperative outcomes
The DIE-GE lymphatic bypass achieved effective local control of chylous ascites in both SLE and non-SLE patients. However, postoperative courses differed markedly. In non-SLE cases, gradual resolution occurred over two years without recurrence or complications. Nutritional status also improved steadily during follow-up. In contrast, the SLE case showed rapid resolution within one week, plausibly aided by intraoperative chyle evacuation. Nonetheless, recovery was complicated by persistent lower limb edema and hypoalbuminemia, findings that reflect ongoing systemic disease activity. Despite theoretical concerns regarding flap compression within the confined retrorectus space, no ischemia or herniation was observed. These outcomes support the safety of complete fascial closure. They also underscore the additional complexity of postoperative care in autoimmune disease. A multidisciplinary approach integrating immunologic, nutritional, and structural support is essential to ensure sustained clinical benefit.

Cross-etiology implications
The postoperative outcomes in this study demonstrate the adaptability of the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass across diverse etiologies. In non-SLE cases, the technique effectively managed lymphatic obstruction following transplantation or malignancy, achieving durable ascites control and improved nutritional recovery. However, intentional nonclosure of the anterior rectus sheath to protect the DIE pedicle may pose a latent herniation risk, warranting long-term surveillance.

By contrast, this is the first report of DIE-GE application in SLE-associated chylous ascites, a condition driven by immune-mediated lymphatic dysfunction and impaired tissue repair. The successful outcome highlights the feasibility of this approach in autoimmune contexts when combined with tailored refinements, such as retrorectus flap placement and complete fascial closure. These adaptations address tissue fragility while maintaining structural stability, offering a potential surgical model for lymphatic reconstruction in inflammatory diseases.

Challenges in SLE Chylous Ascites
To better define the unique challenges of SLE-associated chylous ascites, we conducted a systematic analysis incorporating the present case and 18 published reports (Table 1). This evaluation examines epidemiological trends, treatment responses, and existing gaps, aiming to clarify disease characteristics and inform future diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

Demographic characteristics
Among the 19 reported cases of SLE-associated chylous ascites, 84% (16 of 19) occurred in female patients, with a median age of 38 years (range, 23–93), consistent with the established epidemiological profile of SLE [9]. Geographically, cases were documented across Asia, Africa, Europe, and the Americas, confirming a global presence despite limited recognition. A disproportionate number originated from China (8 of 19, 42%), compared with South Korea and India (2 each), and single reports from Tunisia, Taiwan, Argentina, Turkey, the United States, Croatia, and Japan. This skewed distribution may reflect regional reporting bias, heightened clinical awareness, or a greater tendency to publish rare SLE manifestations.

Notably, 79% (15 of 19) of patients also developed chylothorax, indicating that SLE-related chylous effusions often involve multiple anatomical compartments. This pattern is compatible with systemic lymphatic disruption driven by chronic inflammation or immune-mediated injury to central conduits such as the thoracic duct and cisterna chyli. Awareness of this multichamber tendency is clinically important when evaluating unexplained effusions in patients with active SLE [1,8].

Therapeutic limitations
Therapeutic outcomes in SLE-associated chylous ascites remain limited. Among 19 reported cases, complete remission was achieved in only 18% of patients treated with conservative therapy alone, rising to 43% when combined with conventional surgery. Despite this modest improvement, overall efficacy remained suboptimal. The mortality rate was 16% (3 of 19), with all deaths occurring in patients aged 68 to 93 years. This association suggests that advanced age confers increased vulnerability, likely due to coexisting immune dysfunction, comorbid conditions, and diminished physiologic reserve. These findings highlight the limitations of monotherapy and support early risk stratification and tailored multimodal strategies integrating immunosuppression, nutritional optimization, and reconstructive surgery.

Toward a new therapeutic direction
Conventional therapies for SLE-associated chylous ascites remain inadequate, primarily due to the diffuse lymphatic disruption and chronic inflammation characteristic of the disease. Localized interventions often provide only temporary relief without sustained control. The current case (Case 19 in Table 1) introduces the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass as an innovative approach that combines microsurgical vascular anastomosis with vascularized lymph node transfer to redirect chyle into the systemic circulation. In contrast to conventional surgical procedures, the present case demonstrated complete and sustained remission following DIE-GE lymphatic bypass.

This outcome raised the overall complete remission rate among surgically managed patients to 50% (4 of 8), compared to 43% for conventional procedures alone. The favorable response observed suggests that DIE-GE lymphatic bypass may represent a promising microsurgical option when both standard immunosuppression and traditional surgical approaches prove inadequate. In addition to mechanical diversion, this technique may offer immunological and regenerative benefits through local immunomodulation and lymphangiogenesis. Although based on a single patient, the rapid resolution of chylous ascites and sustained clinical stability observed support the therapeutic potential of this intervention. Broader validation and standardized protocols, along with integrated postoperative care, are essential to advance treatment in this complex setting.

Study Limitations
Several limitations should be acknowledged. SLE-associated chylous ascites is exceedingly rare, and current literature consists primarily of isolated case reports, which may introduce selection and publication bias and limit generalizability. In this study, follow-up beyond one year was conducted through structured telephone consultations due to geographic constraints, which may have limited the detection of delayed complications such as herniation, perfusion deficits, or fibrosis. The proposed mechanisms of therapeutic benefit, including lymphatic rerouting, immunologic modulation, and lymphangiogenesis, were not directly verified and require further confirmation through dedicated imaging or histologic analysis. Although the successful application of rectus sheath closure and flap fixation demonstrates technical feasibility in this case, broader validation across diverse SLE subtypes and disease severities is essential to determine scalability and refine surgical selection criteria.

Conclusion

This study presents the first comprehensive review of SLE-associated chylous ascites, offering an evidence-based framework for therapeutic comparison and addressing a critical gap in clinical understanding. Both pharmacologic and conventional surgical approaches demonstrated limited efficacy, particularly in refractory cases. Within this context, the current case represents the first successful application of the DIE-GE lymphatic bypass in SLE, achieving complete ascites resolution and sustained postoperative stability. These findings suggest that the technique may offer a durable therapeutic option for autoimmune lymphatic disorders. Further studies are warranted to confirm its safety, optimize surgical protocols, and evaluate broader clinical utility.

References

  1. Bhardwaj R, Vaziri H, Gautam A, Ballesteros E, Karimeddini D, Wu GY. Chylous ascites: A review of pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. J Clin Transl Hepatol 2018;6(1):105–113. [View Article]
  2. Al-Busafi SA, Ghali P, Deschenes M, Wong P. Chylous ascites: Evaluation and management. ISRN Hepatol 2014;2014:240473. [View Article]
  3. Dababneh Y, Mousa OY. Chylous ascites (archived). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025. [View Article]
  4. Ciudad P, Chen HC, Bustos SS, et al. The deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap connected to gastroepiploic lymph node flap for treatment of refractory chylous ascites: Report of two cases. Microsurgery 2021;41(4):376–383. [View Article]
  5. Lee CK, Han JM, Lee KN, et al. Concurrent occurrence of chylothorax, chylous ascites, and protein-losing enteropathy in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol 2002;29(6):1330–1333. [View Article]
  6. B'Chir Hamzaoui S, Abdallah M, Bouslama K, et al. [Chylous ascites revealing a systemic lupus erythematosus (L)]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2007;31(1):100–101. [View Article]
  7. Chen GL, Yang DH, Hsu WH. Chylous ascites and pleural transudate: Rare presentations in systemic lupus erythematosus in old age. Case Reports Immunol 2012;2012:390831. [View Article]
  8. Manzella DJ, Dettori PN, Hertimian ML, Melero MJ. Chylous ascites and chylothorax as presentation of a systemic progression of discoid lupus. J Clin Rheumatol 2013;19(2):87–89. [View Article]
  9. Soysal DE, Hizar Turan S, Ozmen M, et al. A rare case of systemic lupus erythematosus with chylous ascites and chylothorax. Case Rep Rheumatol 2013;2013:797696. [View Article]
  10. Chennadi S, Charoenpong P, Zulqarnain S. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with refractory bilateral chylothorax and chylous ascites. CHEST 2016;150(4):574A. [View Article]
  11. Kakar A, Pipaliya K, Gogia A. A rare combination: Chylous polyserositis and autoimmune myelofibrosis as a presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Int J Rheum Dis 2019;22(3):516–520. [View Article]
  12. Zhang GH, Zhang LL, Wang YH, Shen WB. Clinical characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus with chylothorax and/or chylous ascites: An analysis of 15 cases in China. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020;99(51):e23661. [View Article]
  13. Banic M, Pavlisa G, Hecimovic A, et al. Refractory systemic lupus erythematosus with chylous effusion successfully treated with sirolimus: A case report and literature review. Rheumatol Int 2023;43(9):1743–1749. [View Article]
  14. Kuwahara Y, Tashiro H, Takeshita G, et al. Refractory bilateral chylothorax and chylous ascites in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus treated by pleuro-peritoneal and peritoneal-venous shunts along with cell-free and concentrated ascites re-infusion therapy. Respir Investig 2024;62(6):1191–1194. [View Article]
  15. Browse NL, Wilson NM, Russo F, al-Hassan H, Allen DR. Aetiology and treatment of chylous ascites. Br J Surg 1992;79(11):1145–1150. [View Article]
  16. Liu J, Zhang H, Du Q, Yao S. Successful laparoscopic treatment of chylous ascites after pelvic lymphadenectomy: A case report and peanut oil application. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25(5):923–926. [View Article]
  17. Huang Y, Gloviczki P, Duncan AA, et al. Management of refractory chylous ascites with peritoneovenous shunts. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2017;5(4):538–546. [View Article]
  18. Chen E, Itkin M. Thoracic duct embolization for chylous leaks. Semin Intervent Radiol 2011;28(1):63–74. [View Article]
  19. Othman S, Azoury SC, Klifto K, Toyoda Y, Itkin M, Kovach SJ. Microsurgical thoracic duct lymphovenous bypass in the adult population. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021;9(10):e3875. [View Article]
  20. Ishiura R, Mitsui K, Danno K, Banda CH, Inoue M, Narushima M. Successful treatment of large abdominal lymphatic malformations and chylous ascites with intra-abdominal lymphovenous anastomosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2021;9(2):499–503. [View Article]
  21. Klifto KM, Card EB, Itkin M, Kovach SJ. Microsurgical peritoneovenous bypass for the treatment of recalcitrant chylous ascites. Plast Reconstr Surg 2023;152(2):433–439. [View Article]
  22. Winters H, Tielemans HJP, Paulus V, Hummelink S, Slater NJ, Ulrich DJO. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vascularized lymph node transfer for breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2022;10(3):786–795.e1. [View Article]
  23. Wang JH, Wei CY. Comments on "The deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap connected to gastroepiploic lymph node flap for treatment of refractory chylous ascites: Report of two cases". Microsurgery 2022;42(1):101. [View Article]
  24. Viitanen TP, Visuri MT, Sulo E, Saarikko AM, Hartiala P. Anti-inflammatory effects of flap and lymph node transfer. J Surg Res 2015;199(2):718–725. [View Article]

Editorial Information

Publication History

Received date: March 10, 2025
Accepted date: May 19, 2025
Published date: June 11, 2025

Acknowledgement

We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the multidisciplinary medical team at our institution for their expertise and dedicated care in the evaluation and management of this patient.

Disclosure

The manuscript has not been presented or discussed at any scientific meetings, conferences, or seminars related to the topic of the research.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study adheres to the ethical principles outlined in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its subsequent revisions, or other equivalent ethical standards that may be applicable. These ethical standards govern the use of human subjects in research and ensure that the study is conducted in an ethical and responsible manner. The researchers have taken extensive care to ensure that the study complies with all ethical standards and guidelines to protect the well-being and privacy of the participants.

Funding

The author(s) of this research wish to declare that the study was conducted without the support of any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The author(s) conducted the study solely with their own resources, without any external financial assistance. The lack of financial support from external sources does not in any way impact the integrity or quality of the research presented in this article. The author(s) have ensured that the study was conducted according to the highest ethical and scientific standards.

Conflict of Interest

In accordance with the ethical standards set forth by the SciTeMed publishing group for the publication of high-quality scientific research, the author(s) of this article declare that there are no financial or other conflicts of interest that could potentially impact the integrity of the research presented. Additionally, the author(s) affirm that this work is solely the intellectual property of the author(s), and no other individuals or entities have substantially contributed to its content or findings.

Publisher Disclaimer

It is imperative to acknowledge that the opinions and statements articulated in this article are the exclusive responsibility of the author(s), and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of their affiliated institutions, the publishing house, editors, or other reviewers. Furthermore, the publisher does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of any statements made by the manufacturer(s) or author(s). These disclaimers emphasize the importance of respecting the author(s)' autonomy and the ability to express their own opinions regarding the subject matter, as well as those readers should exercise their own discretion in understanding the information provided. The position of the author(s) as well as their level of expertise in the subject area must be discerned, while also exercising critical thinking skills to arrive at an independent conclusion. As such, it is essential to approach the information in this article with an open mind and a discerning outlook.

Copyright

© 2025 The Author(s). The article presented here is openly accessible under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). This license grants the right for the material to be used, distributed, and reproduced in any way by anyone, provided that the original author(s), copyright holder(s), and the journal of publication are properly credited and cited as the source of the material. We follow accepted academic practices to ensure that proper credit is given to the original author(s) and the copyright holder(s), and that the original publication in this journal is cited accurately. Any use, distribution, or reproduction of the material must be consistent with the terms and conditions of the CC-BY license, and must not be compiled, distributed, or reproduced in a manner that is inconsistent with these terms and conditions. We encourage the use and dissemination of this material in a manner that respects and acknowledges the intellectual property rights of the original author(s) and copyright holder(s), and the importance of proper citation and attribution in academic publishing.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, AIG hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, AIG hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, AIG hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Medical Gastroenterology, AIG hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, AIG Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
Email: ravi_2488@yahoo.co.in
Address: Survey No. 136, 4/5, Plot No. 2/3, Mindspace Road, P. Janardhan Reddy Nagar, Gachibowli, Hyderabad, Telangana 500032, India
Table 1.jpg

Table 2.jpg

Figure 1.jpg
Figure 1. Schematic of DIE-GE bypass for chylous ascites. (A) Preoperative image showing the cranial GE-VLN harvested from the greater curvature of the stomach and the caudal DIE-LCF harvested from the lower abdomen, both depicted in orange. Green circles indicate lymph nodes; blue and red lines represent lymphatic channels and vascular pedicles. Arrows show the planned direction of flap transfer. (B) Postoperative image showing anastomosis of the two flaps to establish a bypass route for chylous fluid drainage into systemic circulation (green arrow). The red X marks the ligation site of the distal deep inferior epigastric vessels near the bifurcation of the external iliac vessels. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.
Figure 2.jpg
Figure 2. Operative findings and sequential harvest of lymphatic flaps for DIE-GE bypass reconstruction. (A) Preoperative image showing abdominal distension and placement of a drainage catheter for continuous evacuation of chylous fluid. (B) Intraoperative image showing harvest of the DIE-LCF along the lateral border of the left rectus abdominis. (C) Intraoperative image revealing milky chylous fluid accumulated within the peritoneal cavity. (D) Image after harvest showing the cranial GE-VLN and the caudal DIE-LCF prepared for transfer. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.
Figure 3.jpg
Figure 3. Intraoperative anastomosis and postoperative findings of DIE-GE bypass. (A) Intraoperative image showing the left posterior rectus plane before vascular anastomosis, with the cranial GE-VLN and caudal DIE-LCF positioned for connection. (B) Intraoperative close-up view showing the anastomosis sites, including arterial anastomosis (cranial) and venous anastomosis (caudal) completed with a coupler, both clearly visualized. (C) Postoperative image at one year showing reduced abdominal girth, absence of drainage catheters, and a visible midline scar. Abbreviations: DIE-GE, combined deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic; DIE-LCF, deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap; GE-VLN, gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap.
Figure 4.jpg
Figure 4. Preoperative and one-year postoperative abdominal CT demonstrating resolution of chylous ascites. (A) Preoperative axial CT image showing moderate to severe ascites, with large homogeneous low-density fluid collections surrounding intra-abdominal organs. (B) Preoperative coronal CT image further illustrating the bilateral distribution of ascitic fluid. (C) One-year postoperative axial CT image showing complete resolution of ascites and restoration of normal intra-abdominal anatomy. (D) One-year postoperative coronal CT image confirming absence of fluid accumulation and clear visualization of abdominal structures. CT, computed tomography.

Editor’s Comments

All three reviewers commended the study for its innovative application of the DIE-LCF to GE-VLN flap anastomosis technique in the management of refractory chylous ascites in a patient with SLE, emphasizing its significant clinical potential. However, the reviewers consistently note that the mechanisms underlying the procedure (e.g., the connection to CCLA and the resolution process) and technical details (e.g., incision design and vascular pedicle management) could benefit from further clarification and analysis. Reviewer 1 raises concerns about the potential risk of flap compression, Reviewer 2 points out areas where the rationale for VLNT could be strengthened, and Reviewer 3 suggests including additional details on the patient’s SLE history and albumin data to enhance the study’s comprehensiveness.

In my view, the authors have not yet fully showcased the distinctive value of their work. First, SLE-related chylous ascites is exceptionally rare, with only 32 cases documented in the literature, most of which rely on non-surgical treatments with limited success. This study is the first to apply DIE-LCF to GE-VLN anastomosis for SLE-associated chylous ascites, offering a promising new approach for refractory cases. Second, while this technique was previously used only for cancer-related chylous ascites, this study successfully extends its application to SLE, opening a new clinical avenue and providing a potential breakthrough for managing lymphatic complications in SLE, which are associated with high mortality rates.

To further elevate the study’s academic impact, I recommend incorporating two comparative tables. Table 1 could summarize the 33 reported cases of SLE-related chylous ascites or chylothorax (including the current case), comparing clinical characteristics and outcomes. Table 2 could contrast the current case with the two prior DIE-LCF to GE-VLN cases to highlight key differences. Our editorial team is pleased to provide table templates (Suggested Tables 1 and 2 for inclusion) to help highlight the unique contribution of this case to the management of SLE-associated chylous ascites. With these revisions, the manuscript is well-positioned to serve as a pivotal reference in SLE lymphatic treatment and has strong potential for publication.


ResponseWe thank the editor for the valuable additions to the article. These have been incorporated in the manuscript (Table 1, line 118, page 6; Table 2, line 149, page 7). As a methodological note, the scope of the present study is limited to cases of SLE-associated chylous ascites. Therefore, cases involving chylothorax without accompanying ascites (n = 14) were excluded from the comparative analysis to ensure clinical consistency and analytic rigor.

Reviewer 1 Comments

This study presents an innovative microsurgical technique for treating refractory chylous ascites in a 36-year-old patient with SLE. The technique uses a DIE-LCF anastomosed to a GE-VLN. The flaps were placed in the retro-rectus plane to reduce herniation risk. Post-surgery, ascites resolved within one week. A 6-month CT scan confirmed sustained resolution. These outcomes highlight significant clinical potential. Building on the technique reported by Ciudad et al., this study enhances structural stability by placing the GE-VLN flap in the retro-rectus plane and fully closing the rectus sheath. However, the potential for flap compression in the retro-rectus plane and the long-term effects of the cruciate incision warrant further exploration. Additional discussion of technical details, such as incision design and vascular pedicle management, would enrich the analysis. I suggest the authors elaborate on these technical details to enhance the manuscript’s readability, scientific rigor, and impact.

  1. The authors thoughtfully placed the GE-VLN flap in the retro-rectus plane, adding a new dimension to the DIE-LCF to GE-VLN technique. Post-surgery, the successful outcomes highlight significant clinical potential. Unlike Ciudad et al., who used superficial flap placement (e.g., extraperitoneal) to prevent herniation, this study employs the retro-rectus plane to reduce herniation risk. However, this approach may increase the potential for flap compression. For instance, excessive tension in closing the rectus sheath could compress the vascular pedicle in this deeper position. This might impair blood flow and lead to flap ischemia. The manuscript does not describe intraoperative measures to ensure the vascular pedicle remains free from twisting or compression. Additionally, the cruciate incision may compromise the long-term integrity of the posterior rectus sheath. This risk is particularly relevant in SLE patients, where chronic inflammation could heighten the likelihood of abdominal wall bulging. I suggest the authors evaluate these risks, including flap compression and rectus sheath weakening, and elaborate on intraoperative strategies to address them.
    ResponseWe introduced the GE VLN into the retrorectus plane by creating a cruciate incision in the posterior rectus sheath rather than leaving a gap in the rectus sheath closure. Our patient had a BMI greater than 35 kg/m² and was at elevated risk for ventral hernia formation. Therefore, we opted for primary closure of the rectus sheath. The cruciate incision was made at the junction of the upper and middle thirds of the rectus muscle. The opening was precisely sized to allow passage of the GE VLN pedicle, neither constricting it nor loose enough to permit entry of other structures. The retrorectus plane was developed with sufficient lateral width to accommodate the flap while minimizing compressive forces in this deeper plane. The flap was anchored to both the parietal peritoneum and the rectus sheath to prevent prolapse or twisting. The posterior rectus sheath was loosely reapproximated a few centimeters above and below the cruciate incision to avoid excessive tension. The anterior rectus sheath was then closed using standard layered suturing techniques, which is critical for preventing ventral hernia formation. In routine surgical practice, intestinal stomas are passed through intact rectus muscle without significant risk of ischemia or obstruction, supporting the anatomical feasibility of this approach. Therefore, we considered the risk of compression in the posterior rectus sheath and retrorectus plane to be low. Given the presence of SLE, leaving a gap in the rectus sheath would have posed a significant risk in this patient. As such, we selected an alternative approach, which proved successful. Ascites resolved completely, and no radiologic evidence of herniation was observed. The patient also did not report any abdominal bulging (lines 132 to 147, pages 6 to 7).
     
  2. The manuscript describes the cruciate incision and flap fixation for placing the GE-VLN flap in the retro-rectus plane. However, the authors could further elaborate on the incision design, including its size and precise location. Details on the fixation method and vascular pedicle management, such as pedicle length and measures to prevent twisting, would also enhance clarity. These omissions limit the reproducibility of the retro-rectus plane placement. Additionally, the manuscript does not fully clarify how this approach differs from Ciudad et al.’s method, particularly regarding gap size in the rectus sheath or flap depth. I suggest the authors provide these technical details to improve the transparency and reproducibility of the technique.
    ResponseIn addition to the above, we added the following statement: “In the Ciudad et al technique, an unstitched gap was kept at the point where the deep inferior epigastric cable was introduced intraperitoneally. In our technique, the GE VLN was brought into the retrorectal plane and anastomosis was performed” (page 6, lines 129 to 131).

Reviewer 2 Comments

A 36-year-old patient with SLE presented with persistent, refractory chylous ascites. Conventional treatments failed to provide relief. The authors introduced a novel microsurgical technique, anastomosing a DIE-LCF to a GE-VLN, offering a new therapeutic pathway for complex lymphatic disorders. The case underscores the clinical value of this approach. However, the discussion of the mechanism underlying ascites resolution lacks clarity, supporting literature, and specific hypotheses. Additionally, the mention of VLNT is abrupt and its relevance to chylous ascites is insufficiently explained. Revising the discussion to propose plausible mechanisms, supported by relevant literature, and clarifying the role of VLNT would enhance the logical flow and academic depth of the manuscript.

  1. The discussion of the mechanism behind ascites resolution is brief. It mentions possible mechanisms but lacks supporting literature or testable hypotheses. It also does not explore how SLE’s inflammatory background affects these mechanisms. I recommend adding theoretical hypotheses to strengthen scientific rigor. For example, based on the cited literature, the DIE-LCF to GE-VLN procedure may work through multiple mechanisms in SLE-related chylous ascites: (A) Reconstructed Drainage Pathway: Chylous fluid flows from the peritoneal cavity into the GE-VLN lymph nodes. Microvascular anastomosis allows drainage through the deep inferior epigastric and gastroepiploic veins. The gastroepiploic artery’s high-pressure effect enhances flow in the DIE-LCF lymphatic channel [Wang & Wei, Microsurgery, 2022;42:101]. This bypasses intra-abdominal blockages, directing fluid into the systemic venous circulation [Ciudad et al., Microsurgery, 2021;41:376-383], markedly improving drainage efficiency. (B) Anti-inflammatory and Microenvironment Improvement: The GE-VLN’s vascularized lymphatic tissue promotes an anti-inflammatory response by increasing IL-10 levels and reducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α. This mitigates SLE-related local inflammation and supports a favorable lymphatic microenvironment [Viitanen et al., J Surg Res, 2015;199(2):718-25]. In SLE, chronic inflammation and lymphatic obstruction may depend more on anti-inflammatory effects to ease microenvironment damage and support lymphatic reconstruction. Compared to non-SLE cases, like cancer-related ascites [Ciudad et al., Microsurgery, 2021;41:376-383], SLE patients may benefit more from immune modulation and microenvironment improvement. (C) Lymphangiogenesis and Drainage Promotion: The GE-VLN’s healthy lymphatic tissue may promote lymphangiogenesis, potentially driven by VEGF-C, and could form new lymphatic-venous connections [Ciudad et al., Microsurgery, 2021;41:376-383]. This process likely rebuilds drainage pathways, accelerating ascites resolution [Ciudad et al., Microsurgery, 2021;41:376-383; Wang & Wei, Microsurgery, 2022;42:101].
    ResponseWe agree with the reviewer's opinion and have incorporated the suggestions into the article (lines 150 to 170, pages 7 to 8).
     
  2. The fifth paragraph of the discussion first describes VLNT for treating extremity lymphedema. It then shifts to the DIE-LCF to GE-VLN procedure for chylous ascites, creating a logical gap. The connection between VLNT and SLE-related chylous ascites is not clearly established. I suggest clarifying the relationship between VLNT and this procedure. The authors should emphasize that this technique is an advanced form of VLNT, tailored for chylous ascites. Here is a proposed revision: VLNT effectively treats extremity lymphedema by transplanting healthy lymph nodes to bypass damaged pathways [14]. This study builds on VLNT principles, refining Ciudad et al.’s (2021) DIE-LCF to GE-VLN technique for SLE-related chylous ascites.
    ResponseWe agree with the recommendation and have added the corresponding content (lines 119 to 121, page 6).

Reviewer 3 Comments

This is a case report of a 36-year-old male patient with SLE who experienced refractory chylous ascites. Treatments such as immunosuppressants, thoracic duct ligation, laparoscopic surgery, and glue embolization failed. He was referred to the Plastic Surgery department for a solution. The study presents an innovative microsurgical approach. It employs microvascular anastomosis of DIE-LCF to GE-VLN to bypass intra-abdominal lymphatic blockages. This drains chylous fluid into the systemic circulation. During surgery, 4 liters of chylous fluid were removed. One week after surgery, the ascites resolved. A 6-month CT scan confirmed no recurrence. Albumin levels improved. Unlike Ciudad et al.’s technique for non-autoimmune chylous ascites, this approach targets SLE’s inflammatory lymphatic obstruction. It addresses a gap in autoimmune treatment and redefines lymphatic disorder management. However, the connection to CCLA remains underexplored. Clinical data, such as albumin changes and drainage volume timelines, are limited. Adding numbers, like albumin levels before and after surgery, would make the report more scientifically solid.

  1. The first paragraph of the discussion mentions CCLA. It lists manifestations like chylous vaginal leakage and protein-losing enteropathy. However, it does not connect these to the patient’s condition or the surgical procedure. This disrupts reading coherence. The relevance of CCLA to this case is unclear. I suggest clarifying the link between CCLA and the patient’s condition. Based on the findings in Reference 1, the following revision is suggested: CCLA affects major lymphatic structures, such as the lumbar lymphatic trunks, cisterna chyli, and thoracic duct. Obstruction may increase pressure within the lymphatic system. This can cause chylous fluid to leak into the peritoneal, pleural, or pericardial cavities. Such leaks result in symptoms like chylous ascites or pleural effusion. In this case, SLE-induced inflammation likely exacerbated lymphatic obstruction, leading to refractory chylous ascites.
    ResponseWe agree with the suggested changes and have incorporated them into the revision (lines 93 to 98, page 5).
     
  2. In the "Case Report" section, I recommend including the patient’s SLE history, including disease duration, to strengthen the link between chylous ascites and SLE. The clinical presentation should detail symptoms, such as abdominal distension and pain, and physical examination findings, like edema severity and abdominal circumference. The medical history needs a clear timeline, including the onset of chylothorax. Quantitative data, such as albumin levels (e.g., 2.1 to 3.0 g/dL) and weight changes, should be provided. You note that prior treatments at other hospitals, including drainage, MCT diet, TPN, and glue embolization, were ineffective but lack details on treatment duration, dosage, or data sources. I suggest including specifics, such as "MCT diet for 6 weeks with no reduction in ascites" or "imaging 4 weeks post-embolization confirming failure." If these data are incomplete due to reliance on other hospitals’ records, this should be acknowledged in the study limitations, noting potential recall bias. Additionally, you note that a 6-month post-operative abdominal CT showed complete resolution of ascites and improved serum albumin levels. However, the term "improved" is vague and lacks quantitative data. I suggest specifying pre- and post-operative serum albumin concentrations (e.g., from X g/L to Y g/L) and indicating whether these levels reached the normal range (35-50 g/L). If follow-up data are unavailable due to patient loss to follow-up or recall bias from telephone interviews, this should also be addressed in the study limitations. These additions would enhance scientific rigor and transparency.
    ResponseWe thank the reviewer for the kind suggestions. We have rewritten the case report to include the recommended information: A 36-year-old male was diagnosed with refractory chylous ascites. He had a 13-year history of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and lupus nephritis. Prior to his presentation at our center, he had undergone extensive evaluation by a multidisciplinary medical team, which concluded that the chylous ascites was attributable to SLE. Despite treatment with immunosuppressants, his condition failed to improve. Five months before visiting us, he received treatment for chylous effusion in the lungs. He underwent thoracotomy with ligation of the lymphatic leak, followed by pleurodesis. The pleural effusion resolved; however, he subsequently developed progressive abdominal distension and was diagnosed with chylous ascites. He was managed conservatively with repeated paracenteses, a medium-chain triglyceride diet, and total parenteral nutrition. These measures failed to yield clinical improvement. Six weeks later, he underwent conventional lymphangiography with glue embolization at the level of the fourth lumbar vertebra. However, chylous ascites persisted, and repeat imaging two weeks later confirmed continued leakage. A magnetic resonance lymphangiogram was performed but was nondiagnostic, as there was no dye uptake following injection into the lymph nodes. Two months prior to undergoing microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction, he underwent laparoscopic ligation of the suspected chyle leak in the parietal peritoneum. Postoperatively, the ascites remained unresolved, and he was referred to the plastic and reconstructive surgery team. During this time, he received albumin transfusions and supportive care before being referred to our center. He subsequently underwent microsurgical lymphatic bypass using a deep inferior epigastric lymphatic cable flap (DIE LF) anastomosed to a gastroepiploic vascularized lymph node flap (GE VLNF). Postoperatively, the chylous ascites gradually resolved over the course of one week. The drains were removed, and he was discharged after a 10-day hospital stay. Use of compression stockings and adherence to a high-protein diet contributed to gradual improvement in lower limb and scrotal edema. At six months postoperatively, abdominal computed tomography revealed complete resolution of ascites. He was later hospitalized at a local facility for pneumonia, during which a localized intra-abdominal fluid collection was identified. The fluid was serous and negative for triglycerides, confirming the absence of recurrent chylous ascites. At the one-year follow-up, there was no evidence of ascites or pleural effusion. However, lower limb edema persisted. The patient’s serum albumin was 2 g/dL prior to surgery. Multiple units of albumin were transfused during the perioperative period, and his serum albumin rose to 3 g/dL one month after surgery. By the one-year follow-up, it had declined again to 2 g/dL. Due to long travel distance and logistical challenges, the patient was unable to attend in-person follow-up visits (lines 21 to 53).

Naalla R, Samantaray SA, Patil S, Rao GV, Reddy DN. Microsurgical lymphatic reconstruction for refractory chylous ascites in systemic lupus erythematosus: Case report and literature review. Int Microsurg J 2025;9(1):2. https://doi.org/10.24983/scitemed.imj.2025.00197