Search Submit
Close

A Simple and Innovative Technique to Offload the Microsurgical Loupe

International Microsurgery Journal. 2022;6(1):3
DOI: 10.24983/scitemed.imj.2022.00162
Article Type: How I Do It

Abstract

Loupes have long been an integral part of the microsurgeon's arsenal, playing an instrumental role in the provision of intricate details. The prismatic lens of the spectacle model may exert enormous and prolonged pressure upon the delicate skin of the nasal bone which lacks a sufficiently thick layer of subcutaneous fat. A simple yet brilliant innovation has been developed that incorporates the principle of offloading to integrate a corn cap into a soft nasal support. This simple technique could prove invaluable to microsurgeons suffering from nasal discoloration or pain following prolonged use of prismatic loupes. The pressure exerted on the nose is reduced by 42% with this technique.

Keywords

  • Corn cap; loupe; magnification; microsurgery; nasal pressure; operating microscope; prismatic; reconstructive surgery; silicone

Introduction

Loupes play an essential role in the arsenal of a microsurgeon, since they allow for fine details to be observed under the loupes [1]. Presently, two types of loupe lenses are available for microsurgeons, prismatic loupes and Galilean loupes. The weight of a prismatic loupe ranges between 100 and 160 grams, which is significantly more than the weight of a Galilean loupe. In plastic surgery, prismatic loupes are more preferred over Galilean loupes for their higher precision and enhanced focus when performing repair of extremely intricate structures [2].

The prismatic loupe can be classified into two types. The first is a headband, while the second is a pair of spectacles [3]. Although the headband model is advantageous in that it does not readily cause fogging of the lens, it can cause headaches for certain individuals because of its bulkiness. While the spectacle model is smaller and more compact, its greatest disadvantage is that the majority of the weight for the lens system is located near the proximal part of the lateral wall of the nose.

A pair of prismatic spectacles exert considerable pressure on the delicate skin surrounding the nasal bone, which lacks a sufficient covering of subcutaneous fat. Numerous surgeons find that after wearing prismatic spectacles continuously for a lengthy period of time, they develop permanent signs of pressure-induced deformation and discoloration of the skin (as in the case of the author). This causes certain aspiring plastic surgeons to develop a subconscious aversion to loupes when undergoing prolonged surgery. An additional issue with this model is that it can cause users to experience frontal headaches after prolonged use.

There may be a benefit to using nose pads to alleviate the problem of loading caused by microsurgical loupes. The most commonly available nose pads that are intended for use with regular spectacles are made of silicone rubber. However, the sheer weight of the loupe may make the nose pads ineffective at providing adequate relief from pressure pain on the nose. Another issue faced by the majority of surgeons is the necessity to replace the nose pads on a frequent basis.

Device Design

The author demonstrates one simple innovation that incorporates the offloading principle and integrates a corn cap onto the soft nasal support in this article (Figure 1). As the corn cap is inverted, the layer of cloth is on the inner side, and the sheet of silicone is on the outer side. In the following step, the inverted corn cap is divided longitudinally on a midline so that it is split into two equal segments all the way up until it reaches the base in such a way that the segments are attached to the base. The segments of the corn cap are now sewn individually onto the nose pad of the loupe, with the base lying in the midline between the two supports. As opposed to a standard nasal pad or support, the three-sided nasal support system is designed with a larger surface area and better molding flexibility. A corn cap is also able to distribute the weight evenly and prevent skin discoloration and pain because of the pliability of silicone.

 

Figure 1. Device design. (A) A corn cap with an inner lining made of silicone sheet and an outer covering made of cloth. (B) Approximately 75% of the mid-anterior and mid-posterior surfaces of the corn cap are cut away. (C) Sewing the cut edges of each segment together forms two tubes with a common base cut open at one end. (D) The nose pads of the loupe are covered by an inverted silicone corn cap.

 

Over the last five years, the author has employed this home-made innovation technique for circumventing iatrogenic nasal pressure sores for approximately 38 hours a week. This corn cap has proven to be extremely comfortable to wear and has not yet required any modification or replacement of the silicone material.

As these silicone caps are gel sheets, they conform to the shape of the nose. The silicone sheets act as a sponge when pressed against the rigid surface of the nose. This allows the silicone sheets to increase the surface area and decrease the pressure per unit surface area. A mathematical equation can be used to estimate the weight of the loupe on the lateral wall of the nose.

 

 

It has been found that pressure for a given weight is inversely proportional to its projected area. To facilitate calculations, the projected surface area of contact of the nasal support was determined in both cases, with and without the cushion. We employed a simple method whereby the nasal pad was dipped in paint and placed on a graph sheet fitted snugly against the lateral nasal wall. On the graph sheet, the nasal pad was positioned similarly to its position on the nasal walls. Paint was applied on the nasal pad to mark the area of contact. A portion of the paint-marked graph sheet was used to calculate the area of contact by counting the number of millimeter squares.  After applying an inverted corn cap, the difference in the area of contact was calculated in a similar manner (Table 1).

 

 

On the basis of the equation provided above, pressure (P) is inversely proportional to contact surface area (A), which yields P2/P1 = A1/A2 = 168/288 = 7/12. Taking into consideration the pressure drop, the percentage reduction is equal to (12-7)/12 x 100 = 42%. For microsurgeons using prismatic loupes with nasal pads, this invention might prove extremely useful as a means to support their performance.

Limitations

With this device, some limitations may be encountered. It is not possible to employ this technique in loupes with headbands, as well as in models without nasal support. It is also worth noting that the silicone caps increase the height of the loupe glass by 1 to 2 mm. Therefore, this feature limits the use of these loupes for individuals with fixed or non-adjustable lenses.

Conclusion

The inverted corn cap offers a simple and inexpensive solution to preventing nasal pigmentation and headaches that may result from long hours of microsurgery performed with loupes. The design of the corn cap conforms to the shape of the nose and distributes the weight of the loupe over a large surface area, thereby reducing pressure and sensations of discomfort on the nose.

References

  1. Stanbury SJ, Elfar J. The use of surgical loupes in microsurgery. J Hand Surg Am 2011;36(1):154-156. [View Article]
  2. Fish FS. The Keeler panoramic prismatic loupe. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1990;16(8):716-717. [View Article]
  3. Juggins KJ. The bigger the better: Can magnification aid orthodontic clinical practice? J Orthod 2006;33(1):62-66. [View Article]

Editorial Information

Publication History

Received date: April 13, 2022
Accepted date: June 06, 2022
Published date: July 07, 2022

Disclosure

The manuscript has not been presented at any meetings on the topic.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

The study is in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Funding

This research has received no specific grant from any funding agency either in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest declared by either the authors or the contributors of this article, which is their intellectual property.

Publisher Disclaimer

It should be noted that the opinions and statements expressed in this article are those of the respective author(s) and are not to be regarded as factual statements. These opinions and statements may not represent the views of their affiliated organizations, the publishing house, the editors, or any other reviewers since these are the sole opinion and statement of the author(s). The publisher does not guarantee or endorse any of the statements that are made by the manufacturer of any product discussed in this article, or any statements that are made by the author(s) in relation to the mentioned product.

Copyright

© 2022 The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY). In accordance with accepted academic practice, anyone may use, distribute, or reproduce this material, so long as the original author(s), the copyright holder(s), and the original publication of this journal are credited, and this publication is cited as the original. To the extent permitted by these terms and conditions of license, this material may not be compiled, distributed, or reproduced in any manner that is inconsistent with those terms and conditions.

Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Tamil Nadu, India
Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Tamil Nadu, India
Email: maithreyi.sethu@gmail.com
Address: Mount Poonamallee Rd, Sri Ramachandra Nagar, Ramachandra Nager, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600116, India
Table 1.jpgThe Contact Area Between the Lateral Nasal Wall and the Nasal Pad With and Without Silicone Cushioning

Figure 1.JPG
Figure 1. Device design. (A) A corn cap with an inner lining made of silicone sheet and an outer covering made of cloth. (B) Approximately 75% of the mid-anterior and mid-posterior surfaces of the corn cap are cut away. (C) Sewing the cut edges of each segment together forms two tubes with a common base cut open at one end. (D) The nose pads of the loupe are covered by an inverted silicone corn cap.

Reviewer 1 Comments

  1. An innovative design has been proposed to reduce the discomfort and pressure associated with prismatic loupes, which are typically large and heavy due to their extensive construction and the placement of prisms between the lenses. The device is a novel design that appears to be feasible for clinical use. There are, however, a few issues that need to be resolved. First, an ideal nose pad for loupe glasses must be easily adjustable to fit the shape of the nose, support the weight of the loupe, and provide an optimal distance between the loupe and the eyes. Such features would ensure that the loupes are of the highest quality and the most comfortable to wear. It is a challenge to make the self-made nose pads adaptable to different faces since they do not have adjustable arms. Do you have any suggestions for dealing with the problem where loupes will be shaped differently depending upon the shape of the individual's face?
    ResponseThese silicone caps are gel sheets that conform to the shape of the nose. When pressed against a hard surface, they absorb the impact by acting as sponges. As the surface area increases, the pressure per unit area decreases (Page 2; Line 37-39). These techniques cannot be applied to loupes with headbands or models without nasal supports. As a result of the silicone caps, the height of the loupe glass may be raised by 1 to 2 mm. This limits the use of these caps with loupes that have non-adjustable, fixed lenses (Page 4; Lines 79-82).
     
  2. What are the materials that are used in making corn caps lining the inside with silicone sheets and the outer part being made of cloth?
    ResponseIt should be noted that the corn cap is inverted so that the layer of cloth is on the inside and the silicone sheet is facing outwards. There are commercially available corn caps which have a layer of silicone gel sheet on the inside, as well as an elastic cloth on the outside. Both of them are glued together. It has been designed in such a way that it is turned inside out. This means that the silicone is outside, which will result in direct contact with the skin of the lateral nasal wall, and that the cloth is inside, for the purpose of holding the stitch that encloses the silicone and allows it to fit the nasal pad (Page 2; Line 25-26).
     
  3. In order to facilitate calculations, the projected surface area of contact of the nasal support was calculated in both cases. What do you mean by the expression "calculated in both cases"? Could you please elaborate on this?
    ResponseSpecifically, I am referring to both of the cases in the following table, which identifies both cases with silicone cushioning and those without silicone cushioning (Page 3; Lines 48-50).
     
  4. In Figure 3, the corn cap has been inverted, with the layer of fabric on the inside and the silicone sheet in the gray color on the outside. The outside layer in Figure 4, however, does not appear to be the silicone layer. The reason for this observation is its color, which is not gray.
    ResponseThat is absolutely correct. I completely agree with you. Please accept my sincere apologies as this is just another brand of silicone corn cap in a beige color. Please find attached a second photograph of the gray silicone.

Reviewer 2 Comments

  1. This article presents the author's novel idea of a U-shaped anti-slip nose pad that ensures even pressure distribution across the bridge of the nose, thereby preventing distortions. It is not only the soft and cushy silicone material that makes this homemade nose pad comfortable to wear, but the fact that it has an innovative design that may effectively reduce pressure on the nose bridge as a result of its unique design. While the technique described here is novel, a few points must be clarified before it can be considered for publication.  First of all,  although the length and breadth of the pad were measured as shown in the table, it is unclear how exactly they were measured. Moreover, the contact area on the nasal bridge does not appear to be included in the calculation of these areas. A further clarification of the above-mentioned points would be helpful.
    ResponseA simple trick was used to achieve this by dipping the nasal pad in paint and keeping it on a securely fitted graph sheet attached to the wall on the lateral side of the nose. A graph sheet was positioned on top of a nasal pad in the same way the nasal pad was positioned on a nasal wall. It is pertinent to note that the paint on the nasal pad was intended to mark the area of contact. The surface area of contact was calculated by counting the millimetre square area of the graph sheet marked in paint. The difference in the area of contact was calculated using a similar procedure after the inverted corn cap was applied (Page 3, lines 50-56)
     
  2. Depending on how bulky the nose pad is, there may be situations where it will interfere with one's field of vision due to its bulk. Additionally, it may cause an increase in the distance between the loupe and the eye, which in turn could interfere with the degree of focus on the object. Could there be a solution to the problem of fitting loupes differently to each individual's nasal structure?
    ResponseSince these silicone caps are gel sheets, they conform to the shape of the nose. When pressed against a rough surface, they act as a sponge. As the surface area increases, the pressure per unit area decreases (Page 2; Line 37-39). In loupes with headbands and models without nasal supports, this technique cannot be used. The silicone caps increase the height of the loupe glass by one to two millimeters. It becomes a limitation when used with loupes with fixed, non-adjustable lenses (Page 4; Lines 79-82).
     
  3. As shown in the table, the pad appears to increase in size by 71% [(288-168)/168] when silicone is added to the pad. It seems to be unclear whether you are comparing loupes with pads and those without; or if you are comparing loupes with silicone pads and those with non-silicone pads? A picture might be helpful in illustrating this point.
    ResponseIn order to simplify the calculation, both the cushioned and uncushioned projected surfaces of the nasal support were calculated. It was accomplished using a method that is very simple, in which the nasal pad was dipped in paint and then placed on a snugly fitting graph sheet that was placed onto the lateral nasal wall. The nasal pad sits on top of the graph sheet in the same way that it sits on the nasal walls. There is a paint mark on the nasal pad that indicates the area of contact. The surface area of contact was calculated by counting the millimetre squares on the graph sheet marked with paint. Similarly, a difference in contact area was calculated after applying the inverted corn cap (Page 3; lines 48-56).
     
  4. The same or similar commercial pads are currently available on the market, costing approximately one dollar per pad. Based on your experience, what would be the approximate cost of producing this pad?
    ResponseThe only cost involved is the cost of the corn cap. We can make this at home in 5 minutes or less by simply slitting it, inverting it, then sewing it over the nasal pads that we use. The only additional things that would be needed would be scissors and a sewing kit, which are probably available in most households, which I am sure will be adequate for the task.

Editorial Comments

  1. Revision of the title is recommended. A title should provide essential information which facilitates easy retrieval from an electronic database. The information will assist researchers in determining their level of interest in the article.
    ResponseThe title has been revised as follows: A simple and innovative technique to offload the microsurgical loupe.
     
  2. Ideally there should be a concise section at the end of the article summarizing the key points discussed in the article.
    ResponseThe following is a concise summary of the key points discussed in the article: The inverted corn cap offers a simple and inexpensive solution to preventing nasal pigmentation and headaches that may result from long hours of microsurgery performed with loupes. The design of the corn cap conforms to the shape of the nose and distributes the weight of the loupe over a large surface area, thereby reducing pressure and sensations of discomfort on the nose.
     
  3. A legend is required to make the table complete.
    ResponseThis table has been updated with the following legend: The contact area between the lateral nasal wall and the nasal pad with and without silicone cushioning.
     
  4. The credentials of the author should be provided, such as MD, PhD. Additionally, the current institution of the author should be clearly indicated.
    ResponseUpon your request, the credentials of the author and the current institution of the author have been clearly indicated.
     
  5. A typographical error has been made regarding the Galileo loupe lens. The correct spelling should be Galilean loupe lens, rather than Galileo.
    ResponseThank you for your reminder. This typographical error has now been corrected.

Sethu M. A simple and innovative technique to offload the microsurgical loupe. Int Microsurg J. 2022;6(1):3. https://doi.org/10.24983/scitemed.imj.2022.00162